This may have been covered already by Wolfgang's excellent responses: The wave arrives at the load and any reflected energy is almost no prop = delay away.=20 In contrast, at other points on the line the reflected energy from the = load (or other discontinuity) arrives 2 x tpd later (where tpd is the = delay from the measurement point to the reflection).=20 This is one reason we may not care about intermediate points on the = line: at the load we need to see signal quality and establish that there = are no voltage levels beyond our limits. At the source signal quality = may not be as critical, but checking voltage levels is important. Why would we care about intermediate points? They could affect crosstalk = or emissions. Any other perspectives on this? Curt Curt McNamara, P.E.=A0// principal electrical engineer=20 Logic Product Development 411 Washington Ave. N. Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55401 T // 612.436.5178 F // 612.672.9489 www.logicpd.com=20 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /=20 This message (including any attachments) contains confidential = information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is = protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should = delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, = copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action = based on it, is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] = On Behalf Of Preethi Ramaswamy Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 5:52 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Relation between slew rate and ISI I'm looking for some information on the relation between slew rate and = ISI effect on high speed memory data signals. From my SI simulation I'm observing that a signal looks much worse with = a higher slew rate than a lower slew rate. But the point I'm tapping is = not at the receiver but a point before the receiver. I don't expect the signal = to look as good as at the receiver but I was hoping that the trends match. = At the receiver itself, the fast corner signal looks better than the slow corner signal. The bus is properly terminated. Looking at the waveform, I see that in the fast corner case, whenever = there is a 1010 pattern, the signal is not reaching its intended Vhigh and = Vlow level. A similar thing happens at the slow corner but the signal swing = is much better. Hence, the eye diagram in the fast corner is almost closed whereas the slow corner looks open. While searching some artciles on this, I found the opposite stated. It = said that ISI effects are more pronounced in the slow corner case and = Crosstalk is more pronounced in the fast corner case. Any experience or insight into this topic would be very helpful. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu