Istvan This is a good suggestion. Did you ever tested the impedance of a board over a wide range of frequency to get the curves? We did it here for individual caps but never for a board. I would imagine a scenario where the impedance is measured in several different points in a check board configuration following the cap network. It would be interesting to take the measurements with only caps placed and nothing else to compare with the theoretical models of network caps provided by Laplace transform templates (Excell or MathCad) Another case would be with the regular board with all the parts. I wonder how different it could be from the simplified "only cap" model. -----Original Message----- From: Istvan Novak - Board Design Technology [mailto:inovak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 1:48 PM To: Daniel.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; inovak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Radiating Ceramic Bulk Capacitors Daniel, One possible scenario is that your boards radiate, and the ceramic capacitors just create an impedance profile such that one board will excite mostly the impedance peaks (this is where the radiation gets worse with the capacitors) and the other board excites mostly the new impedance minima (this is where radiation goes down with capacitors). To prove/disprove this possibility you would need to simulate or measure the impedance profile of the two boards. Regards, Istvan Novak Delivered-To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx From: "Paradis, Daniel" <Daniel.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [SI-LIST] Radiating Ceramic Bulk Capacitors Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:45:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 6495 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 X-original-sender: Daniel.Paradis@xxxxxxxxxx X-list: si-list To all EMC experts. I have been experimenting a little with bulk capacitors recently. And I would like to get your opinion on the following subject. I got 2 different boards with about nine 10uF bulk ceramic capacitor (1206 packages) distributed evenly in a matrix configuration in the digital section of the design. I took the EMI signature of the 2 different designs and I saw the following. One of the board showed a significant reduction in emission with all the bulks in place. The other board showed the exact opposite; The radiation level was much lower when the bulk were removed. I took 3 different measurements for each board/scenarios and compare the average values. I remember having read a document from Dr. Johnson saying that capacitors can sometimes be a very effective EMI radiator. I am assuming that common mode noise can sometimes get trough the bulk to migrate from one power plane to another. Since the impedance of bulk capacitors is quite high at EMI frequencies, a drop of voltage caused by this common mode noise can occur and produce more radiation. My preliminary conclusion is that bulk capacitors cannot be placed arbitrary in a matrix configuration. They should be placed away from high frequency current paths. Also I was thinking that since bulk capacitors (and decoupling or bypass caps) can act as radiators... they should always be placed at the bottom of the board to use the chassis as a Faraday cage. Any thoughts you want to share on the subject? Thanks Daniel Paradis Staff Electrical Engineer Digital Subscriber Networks Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. 5030 Sugarloaf Parkway, ATL 1.3468 Lawrenceville, GA 30042 Tel: (770) 236-7896 Fax: (770) 236-2449 - - - - - - - Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. - - - - - - - This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The information is solely intended for the named addressee (or a person responsible for delivering it to the addressee). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your computer. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu Istvan Novak Sun Microsystems, Inc. Istvan.Novak@xxxxxxx Workgroup Servers, BDT Group, One Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803 Phone: (781) 442 0340 - - - - - - - Appended by Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. - - - - - - - This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The information is solely intended for the named addressee (or a person responsible for delivering it to the addressee). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your computer. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu