Gustavo, Another way to interface to a DUT is by avoiding the connectors altogether and using microprobes. Advantages: lots of BW, low parasitics, flexible for interfacing to many different DUTs. Disadvantages: you really need a probe station to do the probing, probes are fragile and expensive. If you'd like more info, contact me..... -- Gary Otonari -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gustavo Blando Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 12:41 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Question Concerning End Launch SMA connector. Hello Si people. I need to better understand the proper way to interface to a test board with "maybe" end launch SMA connector in order to maintain a constant impedance over a very wide frequency rage > 15GHz or so. This is for a 2.5GB/s - 3.125GB/s application and I have a lot of flexibility of how to design the test board. Here are the questions: 1. In your experience which is the best connector, (or way of connect) for the interface between board and connector. I am going to be injecting TDR/VNA signals. 2. The papers I've seen deals with this transition to a micro-strip structure (top layer routing). What about If I want to test a Strip line?? 2.a. Have any of you been able to put one/two vias to transition to an stripline, and then successfully extract one/two vias from the measurement ??. (For Example) [CONN] -> Connector [VIA] -> Via [uST] -> u-strip line [SST] -> StripLine [SST(Real)] -> Stripline that I want to measure. [S] --> S Parameters [T] --> T Parameters Setup on the test board, only used to extract the connection setting ==================================================================== [CONN]--[uST]--[VIA]--[SST]--[VIA]--[uST]--[CONN] (Test Setup) Extract Sparameters from here ---> [S] [S] -> Convert to ---> [T] => [T] = [T(1/2)] * [T(1/2)] = [T(1/2)]^2 => [T(1/2)] = sqrt([T]) (This part I am not sure, since sqrt([T]) will give me two results, and I won't know which one to pick????) Setup that Includes above structure + the "real" structure to measure. =============================================================== [CONN]--[uST]--[VIA]--[SST/2][SST(Real)][SST/2]--[VIA]--[uST]--[CONN] (Test Setup) Extract Sparameters from there --->[Stotal] [Stotal] -> Convert to [Ttotal]. [T(I want)] = [T(1/2)]^-1 * [Ttotal] * [T(1/2)]^-1 [T (I want)] --> Convert to [S (I want)] Is this doable????, Have you done it???. Is there a better way to do this?. Any information, papers, will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu