[SI-LIST] Re: Propagation delay difference

  • From: "Ihsan Erdin" <erdinih@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: steven.d.corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:41:01 -0500

Steven,

A stripline structure doesn't support a pure TEM mode of propagation
even in a lossless homogeneous medium -owing to its width- hence the
difference in the mode velocities.

Regards,

Ihsan

On 3/13/07, steven.d.corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <steven.d.corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Ihsan -- all TEM waves propagate with the same velocity in a system
> of multiconductor transmission lines in a homogeneous medium, as
> determined by the properties of the medium.  This is true for any number
> of coupled lines -- two coupled striplines is just a special case.
>
> This should make physical sense -- the velocity of a wave traveling in a
> homogeneous, linear, isotropic medium can not be changed by reorienting
> its fields.  Since a TEM wave travels down a transmission line through
> such a medium with no obstructions, we should expect its velocity to be
> that of the dielectric medium.  Reorienting its fields within the
> transverse plane, as we do by changing from even to odd excitation, or
> any combination of the two, will not change the velocity of propagation.
> You can find all the relevant mathematics in "Analysis of Multiconductor
> Transmission Lines" by Clayton R. Paul.
>
> Of course the ideal TEM case is never exactly realized in practice,
> since there are always some non-TEM effects -- conductor losses, finite
> lengths of the lines, lines turning corners, finite extent of the
> dielectric, the list goes on and on.  But in pure theory, all of the
> modal velocities (if we even choose to call them separate modes) are
> identically equal.
>
>   -- Steve
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Steven D. Corey, Ph.D.
> Principal Engineer
> Tektronix - Enabling Innovation
> =20
> http://www.tdasystems.com
> http://www.tektronix.com
> =20
> email: steven.corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> phone: (503) 627-6816
> fax:   (503) 627-2260
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> =20
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
> >[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ihsan Erdin
> >Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 3:50 AM
> >To: jbtera77@xxxxxxxxx
> >Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Propagation delay difference
> >
> >Jongbae,
> >
> >Even in an homogeneous coupled stripline structure, the wave speed is
> >not the same for even and odd propagation modes, hence the difference
> >between common and diff. mode prop. delays. For cases where mutual
> >coupling is very small they get close but theoretically there'll be a
> >difference. The same reasoning applies to the coupled microstrip
> >lines.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Ihsan
> >
> >On 3/9/07, jbtera77@xxxxxxxxx <jbtera77@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hi, all
> >> As all know, in homogeneous strip line, the propagation=20
> >speed  is the same
> >> for both differential and common mode.
> >>
> >> However, in inhomogeneous microstrip line, the propagation speed of
> >> differential mode is faster than that of common mode.
> >> In specific, the value of Cm/C is higher than Lm/L in inhomogeneous
> >> microstrip line while the values are same in homogeneous strip line?
> >>
> >> Could somebody let me know why it physically is?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> Jongbae Park.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --------------------------------------------------------Ph.D=20
> >Candidate
> >> StudentTerahertz Interconnection & Package Laboratory,Department of
> >> Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science=20
> >and Technology
> >> (KAIST),373-1, Kusong-dong, Yusong-ku, Taejon 305-701,
> >>=20
> >KoreaFax)+82-42-869-8058Tel)+82-42-869-5458Mobile)+82-11-9787-7
> >966E-mail)
> >> pjb77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL)
> >>=20
> >http://tera.kaist.ac.kr/---------------------------------------
> >-----------------
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >>
> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >>
> >> For help:
> >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >>
> >>
> >> List technical documents are available at:
> >>                 http://www.si-list.net
> >>
> >> List archives are viewable at:
> >>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >> or at our remote archives:
> >>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe from si-list:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
> >
> >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
> >
> >For help:
> >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
> >
> >
> >List technical documents are available at:
> >                http://www.si-list.net
> >
> >List archives are viewable at:    =20
> >               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> >or at our remote archives:
> >               http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
> >               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> > =20
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List technical documents are available at:
>                 http://www.si-list.net
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> or at our remote archives:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: