[SI-LIST] Re: One stitching via or more vias is better for 25Gbps application???
- From: Leeyuyun <lee.home.61@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 22:31:54 +0800
Hi, Steve
Could you help indicate which paper in Simberian website is about vias
I want to clarify my question as below
# means stitching vias, * means signal vias, + means positive signal, - means
negative signal
1. Only on stitching vias
+++++++++++++++++*++++++++++
#
--------------------------*----------------
2. At least two stitching vias
#
++++++++++++++++*+++++++++++
------------------------*------------------
#
For each structure, what is theory behind? What is your recommendation for
stitching via structure in the 25Gbps structure?
Thank you
Lee
> "steve weir" <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> ©ó 2014/9/6 ¤U¤È8:31 ¼g¹D¡G
>
> Typically, HFSS is used to design structures.
>
> There is not a single correct answer. Z axis transitions are not entirely
> localized. One could design a D pair transition for a single pair and then
> find out when they place that structure, that they have important differences
> in performance due to other surrounding structures including other
> transitions and stitch via patterns. Simberian has several good papers on
> their web site addressing these types of issues.
>
> Steve
>> On 9/6/2014 5:16 AM, leeyuyun wrote:
>> Hi, Steve
>> Thanks your information
>> I have SI wave and HFSS software, and which one is better for 25Gbps
>> application?
>> Do you agree P/N share the same stitching via is a good way?
>> Appreciate your teaching
>> Regards, Lee
>>
>> > "steve weir" <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> ©ó 2014/9/6 ¤U¤È7:45 ¼g¹D¡G
>> >
>> > "It depends". In the general sense: Tighter stitching increases the
>> > lowest cavity resonant frequencies. However stitching is not free, and
>> > where stitching goes particularly close to signal vias can have a big
>> > impact on how the overall structure performs.
>> >
>> > If you want well controlled results that meet a particular loss budget,
>> > then you really need to model in a good solver. You can always contract
>> > with someone to design your transitions for you. There are entire
>> > businesses built around getting structures like this right: Teraspeed,
>> > Wild River, etc.
>> >
>> > Steve
>> > On 9/6/2014 4:25 AM, Leeyuyun wrote:
>> > > Hi, all
>> > > I am doing 100Gbps (4x25Gps) product now
>> > > How do we put stitching vias when high speed signal change the layer?
>> > > This is a differential pair, which has P and N
>> > > Someone told me that one stitching vias is better because P and N share
>> > > the common return
>> > > Someone told me that more stitching vias is better because loop
>> > > inductance could be reduced more
>> > > I am confused which one is better?
>> > > Can anyone help me?
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Lee------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>> > >
>> > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>> > >
>> > > For help:
>> > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > List forum is accessible at:
>> > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>> > >
>> > > List archives are viewable at:
>> > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>> > >
>> > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>> > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Steve Weir
>> > IPBLOX, LLC
>> > 1580 Grand Point Way
>> > MS 34689
>> > Reno, NV 89523-9998
>> > www.ipblox.com
>> >
>> > (775) 299-4236 Business
>> > (866) 675-4630 Toll-free
>> > (707) 780-1951 Fax
>> >
>> > All contents Copyright (c)2013 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
>> > This e-mail may contain confidential material.
>> > If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records
>> > and notify the sender.
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>> >
>> > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>> >
>> > For help:
>> > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>> >
>> >
>> > List forum is accessible at:
>> > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>> >
>> > List archives are viewable at:
>> > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>> >
>> > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>> > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Steve Weir
> IPBLOX, LLC
> 1580 Grand Point Way
> MS 34689
> Reno, NV 89523-9998
> www.ipblox.com
>
> (775) 299-4236 Business
> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free
> (707) 780-1951 Fax
>
> All contents Copyright (c)2013 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
> This e-mail may contain confidential material.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records
> and notify the sender.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List forum is accessible at:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
