Hi Guys I was an RF engineer for many years, and was totally committed to the use of S-Parameters as an accurate model of a passive network. When I became an SI Engineer I tried for several years to use S-Parameters as models of the source, interconnect and destination of Digital signals. Because I was using ADS which had a frequency domain engine together with time domain simulators including SPICE and harmonic balance, and the convolution to make the frequency domain models work in the time domain I was confident that all would work well, using S-Parameters as models. However, several problems emerged: 1. Some vendors were supplying S-Parameters without Phase data(magnitude only) Such data is unusable. 2. Measured S-Parameters contain noise which result in spikes going above "1" resulting in gain for a passive network which causes non-convergence. The data has to be massaged to remove the >1 values, which is time consuming. 3. Measurements of differential S-Parameters are difficult to get because of the single-ended nature of the Vector Network Analyzers. 4. Calibration of the VNA is very hard to perform out to the end of the adapters used. 5. Measured S-Parameters must also have a DC line added in order for the convolution to work. It was very time consuming, tedious and gave questionable data. So, in 2006 I was finally successful in adapting frequency domain transmission models (which generate S-Parameters durring simulation) to measured TDR data. THIS WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL FOR SEVERAL REASONS: 1. TDR measurements with differential head SD-24, so the data was in differential form. 2. TDR data in simple tabular form - time vs magnitude 3. Approximate models are assumed from mechanical data as ADS models. 4. ADS models for transmission lines are simple - trace width, thicknes, dielectric thickness, dieliectric constant, length etc. 5. ADS adjustments of length, width and thickness as first cut to meet approximaely the TDR data. 6. ADS model for frequency dependent (loss and dielectric constant) uses only 3 adjustable parameters. 7. ADS has Optimization model for final adjustments of network models to match measured data. 8. Simulation results from adjusting these models in the time domain is inherently accurate for time domain simulations such as EYE-Patterns and BER simulation. In the above I have given away a lot of what took me years to perfect. However, because I am semi-retired perhaps some of you can carry on. Good luck. Ron Miller -- Ronald B. Miller, Microwave/SI Engineer RAIL = NOISE + REFLECTIONS Gigahertz Data Div of MI Corp. \\ // \\ // 7721 Sunset Avenue \\// \\// Newark, CA 94560 ->JITTER<- EYE ->JITTER<- tel 510-793-4744, //\\ //\\ fax 510-742-6686 // \\ // \\ www.ghzdata.com RAIL = NOISE + REFLECTIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu