Hi Steve, Thanks for your response. I do not have any issue with the current design. I am only checking the current design to find out what will I need to make it run at higher data rate (10 - 12 Gbps). As you have suggested, I need to do more investigation to determine the cause for discontinuities. Regards, Ravinder Ajmani Server PCB Development Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Email: Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 09/17/2010 04:22 PM To Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject [SI-LIST] Re: Microstrip vs. Stripline Ravinder, you would be trading one set of not specifically constrained problems for the problems that you have. What you really need to do is understand what is causing the discontinuities that you have, and what your options are. If you don't have the tools you need, consider contracting with someone who does. Steve. Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Experts, > I have 2.5" long interconnects running at 6 Gbps. Currently I am using > Microstrip transmission lines, routed over 3.5 mil Prepreg, because I am > able to route them on the Top layer without any vias. However TDR shows > impedance discontinuities perhaps caused by non-uniform plating and solder > mask, and weave effect. > > I would like to know if a dual Stripline transmission line will be better > although I will have to use a pair of vias on each trace. My card > thickness is 0.8 mm and back-drilling of the vias is not an option. I > also have to stay with standard FR-4 for cost reasons. I have tried > simulating both options and the simulation supports the Microstrip > approach, but I am not able to simulate the effects of non-uniform plating > and solder mask or weave effect. > > Any suggestions. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Ravinder Ajmani > Server PCB Development > Hitachi Global Storage Technologies > > > Email: Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > -- Steve Weir IPBLOX, LLC 150 N. Center St. #211 Reno, NV 89501 www.ipblox.com (775) 299-4236 Business (866) 675-4630 Toll-free (707) 780-1951 Fax ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu