Hi Ed, Thanks for your message. I did think about solder mask, so I went back to lab and took off the solder, but I did not see any effect. The curve on NWA was right on each other. I will also consult with PCB house to find out any fabrication issues. Thanks! Ming Ed Sayre III wrote: > Ming, > I have seen these elevated losses for materials after processing. As a > first cut at your results I have to ask if you have you taken the solder > mask into account (if you have any)??? That being said this may not be the > only contributor to the difference. Make sure you have the exact losses > for the core or prepreg you are using in your stack. Then you will be able > to go from there. > We have found that some fabricators can help you with these loss term > differences since they are based on any variations that the fabricator may > see. > > Best Regards > -Ed Sayre > > At 06:07 PM 3/18/2005 -0800, Ming Tsai wrote: > >Hi All, > > > >I am studying the microstrip line loss on 10 mil Rogers 4350 (Er = 3.48, > >loss tangent = 0.004 @ 10 GHz). The trace width is 22 mils, with half oz > >copper. From some transmission line calculator I expect to see 0.25dB > >/inch loss @ 10 GHz. However I measured under network analyzer and I got > >the loss up to 0.5dB/inch @ 10 GHz. > > > >I did not have well-setup TRL calibration on board, but I took 3 > >separate measurements from 3", 5" and 7.5" long microstrip lines, and > >estimated the delta to get 0.5dB/in loss. So I assume the edge-mounted > >SMA connector is not a factor. Also checked under TDR I saw 48 ohms of > >line impedance, which is within the spec. I also scratched out the > >solder mask which did not have any effect. I used full-wave tool to > >verify the radiation as well as skin effect, but no surprise the > >simulation showed that I should get about 0.25dB/in loss. > > > >Does anyone have similar experience or any suggestion? Thanks! > > > >Regards, > > > >Ming > >-- > >Ming. Tsai > >Staff Hardware Development Engineer > >Product Technology - Hardware Design Group > >XILINX > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ > >To unsubscribe from si-list: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > >For help: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > >List FAQ wiki page is located at: > > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ > > > >List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.org > > > >List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > >!DSPAM:423b8a13167482647014401! -- Ming J. Tsai, Ph.D. Staff Hardware Development Engineer Product Technology - Hardware Design Group XILINX Telephone: 408-626-6260 E-Mail: ming.tsai@xxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu