Clever! Lee Loyer, Jeff W wrote: > I believe that, for true accuracy, propagation delay measurements should be > relative vs. absolute measurements. I.E., measure the delay of a 5" trace > and compare that to the delay of a 4" trace. The difference is your delay > per inch. This eliminates any ambiguity related to choices of start and end > points, which are arbitrary. > > If you don't have traces of different lengths on the same board, I believe > it's perfectly acceptable to measure a trace, cut the trace 1" shorter, and > measure that same trace. > > Jeff Loyer > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian D. Butler [mailto:brian.butler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:44 AM > To: si_list > Subject: [SI-LIST] Measuring propagation delay on PWB interconnects > > To all: > > I wanted to get opinions on the best way to measure propagation delay > utilizing only a TDR technique (not TDT) on PWB interconnects (utilizing > only a single interconnect). The methods I have seen to-date are: > > Note: Propagation delay is equal to the End point minus the Start point > along the TDR horizontal time axis. All values obtained are the > "round-trip" delay. > > 1) Start point is 50% of risetime curve of TDR probe - End point is 50% of > risetime curve at end of trace. > > 2) Start point is lowest point of capacitance dip (associated with launch > via) - End point is 3mvolts over nominal impedance on the risetime curve at > end of trace. > > 3) Start point is 40% of risetime curve of TDR probe - End point is 40% of > risetime curve at end of trace minus 3.2 * SQRT((Ristetime40%-60% at end of > trace)^2 - (Risetime40%-60% at end of probe)^2) - current IPC TM-650 > method > > 4) Same as any above but utilize falltime curve (by probing a short and > shorting end of trace). > > Any comments on the above methodologies or alternate methods are > appreciated. > > Regards > Brian Butler > Introbotics Corp > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- -- Type: text/x-vcard -- File: vcard.vcf -- Desc: Card for Lee Ritchey ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu