Randy, How would you do this in practice? What impedance would you pick for the min loss pad for measuring an unknown, frequency dependent impedance? Regards, Istvan Novak Oracle On 9/14/2012 12:14 AM, Randy Dawson wrote: > A min loss pad solves the match problem, and with 0402 resistors (or > smaller) at the probe tip solves the reflection issue. > > Randy Dawson > Sencore > > > > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:52:00 -0400 > > From: istvan.novak@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: olaney@xxxxxxxxx > > CC: tom_cip_11551@xxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Measuring PDN impedance with a VNA? > > > > Orin, > > > > I know that you know, but just to clarify for those who are not > familiar > > with these concepts: > > the AC Kelvin-probe arrangements need four connections, which means > > two-port VNAs. > > > > Regards, > > > > Istvan Novak > > Oracle > > > > > > On 9/13/2012 10:43 PM, O. Laney wrote: > > > Since PDN impedances are usually really low compared to 50 ohms, > > > practical measurements often require Kelvin probe arrangements. Yes, > > > that implies the need for 4 VNA ports. > > > > > > Orin > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > > From: "Istvan Novak" <istvan.novak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: tom_cip_11551@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Sent: 9/13/2012 6:54:40 PM > > > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Measuring PDN impedance with a VNA? > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> The type of probe needed depends on the highest frequency you need to > > >> cover. For low-frequency measurements, say up to 10MHz, you dont even > > >> need any probes, just two coax cables, and you can use quite long > > >> pigtails in soldering and the data is still good. With the semirigid > > >> probes shown in the paper you cite, you can do reasonably good > > >> measurements up to about a gigahertz. For even higher frequencies you > > >> need wafer probes. > > >> > > >> To measure low impedances with a VNA, you have to make a two-port > > >> shunt-through connection, which requires two probes and you have > to make > > >> sure that the two probes close through the DUT, not before. If you > > >> connect the two probes together and then you connect the DUT, will > > >> introduce series resistance and inductance, which will raise the > error > > >> floor. > > >> > > >> You can find more details in a later paper: > > >> "Frequency Domain Power Distribution Measurements - An Overview", > > >> DesignCon 2003 East, High-Performance System Design Conference, > Boston, > > >> MA, June 23-25, 2003, which is posted on the same site, or even more > > >> details in the book Frequency Domain Characterization of Power > > >> Distribution Networks. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Istvan Novak > > >> Oracle > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 9/13/2012 8:03 PM, miner_tom Cipollone wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> I have read several references about how to measure the > impedance of > > >>> a PCB PDN (power to ground). > > >>> A VNA can be used to measure these very low impedances but there is > > >>> usually a catch in terms of the probes that should be used. Agilent > > >>> says that in order to measure very low impedances "microprobes" > > >>> should be used. I do not have microprobes. > > >>> As an alternative, I have considered building a "Dual Semi-rigid" > > >>> probe as outlined in > > >>> > http://www.electrical-integrity.com/Paper_download_files/DC99_ProbesAndSetup.pdf. > > >>> With respect to the semi rigid probe made from coax, I have two > > >>> questions: > > >>> In the diagram shown in the referenced article on page 8, slide 18, > > >>> the tips of the probes are not shorted together. I would have > > >>> thought that for this measurement they would be.Up to what > frequency > > >>> is this home made apparatus good? Are there alternative methods? > > >>> Thank You > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu