Hi Istvan, Thanks for your response. I am using microprobes for my measurements, and the VNA set up is calibrated up to the tip of microprobe. I am using same pads for the probe placement for the simulation. So I believe my simulation and measurement setups are identical. Regards Ravinder Ajmani HGST, a Western Digital company ravinder.ajmani@xxxxxxxx Istvan Novak <istvan.novak@xxxxxxxxxxx> 06/08/2012 04:46 PM To Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxx cc "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject Re: [SI-LIST] Re: Measurement/Simulation Correlation Have you made sure that the discontinuities at the connection to the DUT are removed? Regards, Istvan Novak Oracle On 6/8/2012 7:39 PM, Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Antonis, > Thanks for your response. I have not measured the material properties. > The Fab has provided me the Dk and loss tangent values of the material > used by them. I also adjusted the PCB trace geometry and Dk value in the > design database as per the measured stackup and trace parameters and > impedance. Next I tweaked the loss tangent to bring the simulation > results closer to the measurement results, but it does not help much. I > also don't see any passivity or causality issue with the simulation or the > measurement. > > > Regards > Ravinder Ajmani > HGST, a Western Digital company > ravinder.ajmani@xxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > "Antonis Orphanou"<orphanou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > 06/08/2012 04:17 PM > > To > "Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxx"<Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxx>, > "si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"<si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > cc > > Subject > RE: [SI-LIST] Measurement/Simulation Correlation > > > > > > > One important parameter in correlating insertion loss at higher > frequencies using simulation tools is material passivity and material > representation. > The frequency dependency of your material can affect your correlation. > Usually though the standard material representation in the simulation > tools is consistent with Kramers-Kronig passivity and causality > requirements but the values for er and loss tangent is the big question. > In addition I agree with you that roughness will also affect the > correlation as well at higher frequencies. If you have measured material > properties you can use those?? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 3:59 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Measurement/Simulation Correlation > > Hi Experts, > I have built a simple test board for correlating the simulated S-Parameter > data (extracted using Ansoft SIwave) with VNA measurements. I get good > Insertion Loss correlation up to 12 GHz, buy beyond that the measured > Insertion Loss drops more significantly than the simulated data. I have > tried tweaking the dielectric loss, but it does not help much. Could this > added loss be due to surface roughness, which I have not taken in to > account, or the tool limitation. I do get better correlation with the > Mixed-Mode Insertion Loss (within 2 dB up to 20 GHz). > > I may add that my colleague generated S-parameter data on the same design > using Agilent Momentum, which correlates well up to 16 GHz, but also shows > resonances that don't show up in the measurements. It also correlates > well with Mixed-Mode Insertion Loss. > > I will appreciate any lead in to this. > > Thanks. > > > Regards > Ravinder Ajmani > HGST, a Western Digital company > ravinder.ajmani@xxxxxxxx > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List forum is accessible at: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu