[SI-LIST] Re: : May 9th Presentation: "Radiation from Edge Effects in Printe...
- From: MikonCons@xxxxxxx
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:04:48 EDT
Charles:
I haven't found the excerpt you provided from May of 2000 (repeated here for
convenience)...
> ... Because the slot created along the edge of any surface plane (or
> fill) may be inadvertently excited to radiate, mounting provisions for
> "resonance spoiler" capacitors should be placed along the slot. These
> capacitor provisions allow "doctoring" of the structure if emission
problems
> are found and avoid another board spin.
...but, the above comment can apply to the slots created by moats around
functional circuits located within the body of a PCB, and the slots created
by the addition of chassis-ground rings around the periphery of a PCB. I
suspect from your other comments that the latter case is of concern. With
this interpretation in mind, I suggest you review the following in your
design.
Signal ground planes should extend AT LEAST three to five dielectric
thicknesses (i.e., the distance between the power and signal ground planes)
beyond the power plane edge. Propagations (i.e., noise from any source) on
the power planes will then be strongly coupled/terminated to the adjacent
ground planes, thereby minimizing radiation.
With the above in place and at your option, picket fences of
staggered-spacing vias (to minimize possible narrowband ladder resonances)
between ground planes can enclose the noisy power planes, thereby forming an
approximation to an on-board Faraday cage which helps confine leakage of
emissions from the power plane edges.
Assuming chassis ground rings around the board periphery, include "spoiler"
chip capacitor mounting provisions (perhaps three per side/edge) that if
installed would allow a capacitor bridge from the ground plane(s) edge to the
chassis ring structure. Using a suitable near-field probe and a spectrum
analyzer, check for high field strengths along the board edges ("high" is
relative of course). If emission peaks are detected, selectively add one
capacitor at a time in the vicinity of the maximum E-fields and recheck the
emissions. Look for frequency shifts as well, as you may simply have changed
the resonant point for the emissions. The primary intent of the capacitor
provisions is to detune and lower the Q of any slot resonances that may
arise, which in turn would lower the radiated emissions. Selection of a
capacitor value that is self-resonant (when mounted) at the detected
frequency of concern sometimes helps.
As an elaboration to the above, if your near-field probe is a magnetic field
detector, and strong fields are detected near the center of a board edge, you
should add capacitors half way to the corners on each side of the detected
point.
I hope this commentary is of help.
Mike
Michael L. Conn
Owner/Principal Consultant
Mikon Consulting
Cell: (408)821-9843
*** Serving Your Needs with Technical Excellence ***
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
