Andy Ingraham wrote: >> .option POST >> >> Then use >> >> .probe dc/tran/etc v(sig) i(sig) >Have you tried this? > >I just did (i.e., changed from ".OPTION PROBE" to ".OPTION POST"), and >the results are even worse. Instead of 502 node voltages in the output >file, now HSPICE gives me 517! I just tested (in 2000.4) using .option post probe .probe dc v(...... And then using just post. As you mentioned above just using post increases the signals. Sorry about that. But when I added the probe statement to the .options line it worked to limit only signals mentioned in the .probe statement. I only use the "mwaves" analyzer and do not look at signals in the output listing. Maybe other versions other than 2000.4 have a problem. Regards, Bill Cohen Toshiba ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu