[SI-LIST] Is it reasonable that an ICM model specifies a [ICM S-parameter] section using "mult=value" ?

From: slwu <Shulong.Wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Kelly Green <kgreen22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 15:48:58 +0800

Hi Green,

pls look at the following case,

[Begin ICM Model] Example1
ICM_model_type S-parameter
|
[Nodal Path Description]
  Model_nodemap MyModelNodeMapA
  N_section ( A1  A2    B1 B2 ) Mult=3 SectA
  Model_nodemap MyModelNodeMapC
|
[End ICM Model]

...

[Begin ICM Section] SectA
[Derivation Method] Lumped
[ICM S-parameter]
File_name secta.s4p
Port_assignment
| Port Node
1   A1
2   A2
3   B1
4   B2
[End ICM Section] SectA

In above case, the ICM model "Example1" includes a replicated section "SectA",

between front-end port "A1 A2" and back-end port "B1 B2" there exist "three" 
series

sections "SectA", but "Port_assignment" in the define of SectA indicates that 
between

"A1 A2" and "B1 B2" only one section "SectA" exists, not three. So how to 
understand

the circuit topology between "A1 A2" and "B1 B2" confuses me...

Thanks in advanced

Shawn

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field

List FAQ wiki page is located at:
                http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl

List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.org

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu

[SI-LIST] Is it reasonable that an ICM model specifies a [ICM S-parameter] section using "mult=value" ?

Other related posts: