[SI-LIST] Integrated vs. discrete magnetics for Ethernet
- From: "Chauhan, Prakash" <pchauhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:59:42 -0500
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone has comments regarding the use of
integrated magnetics (In the RJ-45) versus a discrete implementation
(for 10/100/1000 Base-T). I have been advised that integrated magnetics
have poorer shielding (between diff pairs) and can be problematic from
an EMC compliance standpoint. I would much prefer to use integrated
Magnetics for space conservation and to have less component count and
simplify layout. If anyone has had problems with the Integrated
Magnetics I would love to hear about it. (I am planning on using Belfuse
Magjack family part: 0826-1X1T-23-F). Any appnotes that can help
implement this from a compliance standpoint would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Prakash.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
