Thanks Hermann for the background. Because LVCMOS & LVTTL spec is DC, hence I never tested my CMOS/TTL buffer with AC waveform against spec. Another question comes into my mind. I believe VIH/VIL really dependant on input signal frequency (please correct me if I am wrong). So at frequency should we run at when testing for VIH/VIL AC? It is not stated in JEDEC AC test condition. --- On Wed, 21/7/10, Hermann Ruckerbauer <hermann.ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Hermann Ruckerbauer <hermann.ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [SI-LIST] Input spec difference between LVCMOS & SSTL To: "See Hour" <yshour2001@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wednesday, 21 July, 2010, 2:48 PM Hello Gary, I can only give some background on SSTL: In memory development (where SSTL is used) Signal integrity is critical due to reflections and ringbacks. AC/DS spec was introduced to optimize Timing budget calculations for such "dirty" Waveforms. The basic thinking behind was to use the Energy tranmitted to the Receiver (but any area calculation was to complicated for a spec) and make sure the Receiver gets some kind of "overdrive" to allow fast switching. This is given by the AC level (+ derating) at the beginning of the eye. Once the Receiver is switched it will not switch back so easy. So the signal is allowed to come down to the DC level what again allows some reflections without violating the spec. Overall the target was to implement some physical Receiver behaviour into the SSTL spec that gives some more margin for timing budgets (especially on multidrop memory systems). Regards Hermann EKH - EyeKnowHow Hermann Ruckerbauer www.EyeKnowHow.de Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Veilchenstrasse 1 94554 Moos Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 schrieb See Hour: > Hi Everyone > > Does anyone know why there is AC and DC VIH/VIL spec for SSTL & HSTL input > but there is only DC VIH/VIL spec for LVCMOS & LVTTL input? > > I couldn't find any related explanation from JEDEC documents. Appreciate if > you have any explanation or direct me to the right source. Thanks. > > Regards > Gary > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu