Full-wave 3D tools certainly can. Steve On 1/8/2012 10:27 PM, Stefan Milnor wrote: > Can current simulation tools and connector models really answer this > question about GND plane "pull back" on edge cards? I am no simulation > expert, but my understanding is that most simulation tools can not even > handle plane splits. > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Hermann Ruckerbauer > Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 10:10 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: High Speed Traces Under Card Edge Fingers > > Hi, > On Memory modules the Pullback is also done to adjust impedance of the > wider fingers. > I would assume that also on MXM3 the fingers are wider, so reduction of > the impedance should make sense. > > As mentioned: Simulation can give a better answer then just assumptions > ... > > > Hermann > > Our next Events: > ================ > > Visit us on Embedded World 2012 > Our location Hall 1 / Booth 509 > > Check our website or contact us for details > > EKH - EyeKnowHow > Hermann Ruckerbauer > www.EyeKnowHow.de > Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Veilchenstrasse 1 > 94554 Moos > Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 > Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 > Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 > > > schrieb Stefan Milnor: >> My PCB crew was routing some HS pairs along the edge under the > fingers, >> I was the bad cop and stopped them. >> >> If the planes are not pulled back, and the traces are isolated from > the >> fingers by planes, it would seem that the trace sig int would be OK. >> >> But I am getting the message that the "pullback is necessary" for the >> connector sig int performance. >> >> Although - Devil's advocate - the only place I can recall seeing this > in >> print is in the PCIe CEM spec. I don't see this recommendation in the >> MXM3 spec, or in the connector vendor's materials. >> >> Thanks, SM >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of steve weir >> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 5:46 AM >> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: High Speed Traces Under Card Edge Fingers >> >> The pullback is necessary to maintain a relatively constant impedance. >> >> Were you routing high speed signals on inner layers in the finger > area? >> That's something I would avoid with or without the PCIe pullback >> requirement. >> >> Steve. >> On 1/7/2012 10:28 PM, Stefan Milnor wrote: >>> Hello Experts >>> >>> The "DDR3 Clock Failing Radiation Tests" discussions have been quite >>> interesting. But here is a different topic: >>> >>> "Remove Planes Under Card Edge Fingers?" >>> >>> In the PCIe CEM document, one finds the following statement: >>> >>> "On the add- in card, the ground and power planes underneath the PCI >>> Express high-speed signals (edge fingers) shall be removed. > Otherwise >>> the edge fingers will have too much capacitance and greatly degrade >>> connector performance" >>> >>> Is this really a concern? >>> >>> We are making small form factor boards with MXM3 connectors, and are >>> wondering if we have to relieve the planes in the "edge finger" area. >> If >>> we do so, then we lose some routing space, for high speed signals at >>> least, as we want to route these against a plain. This is a bit >>> painful. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Stefan >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > -- Steve Weir IPBLOX, LLC 150 N. Center St. #211 Reno, NV 89501 www.ipblox.com (775) 299-4236 Business (866) 675-4630 Toll-free (707) 780-1951 Fax All contents Copyright (c)2012 IPBLOX, LLC. All Rights Reserved. This e-mail may contain confidential material. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records and notify the sender. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu