In a message dated 2/10/03 8:11:10 AM Pacific Standard Time, James_R_Jones@xxxxxxxx writes: > The current is confined > to one skin depth time .7 mils thick of trace.... a much smaller > cross-section, hence lossier. > Partially right! However, unless your traces are VERY close together in space, the coupling (as in current PCB stripline or microstrip construction) is considered very high if you obtain 15% coupling. Therefore, the bulk of the energy is still propagated in the dielectric between the traces and their closest image plane. Practical etching limits on the obtainable trace separation between pairs is currently in the >2 mils area (for PCBs). The use of 1/4-ounce copper or thinner can marginally lower this spacing. Specialized deposition techniques might be available if you HAD to reduce the separation. As usual, the best design judgements will be obtained through using a field solver and assessing whether the losses are acceptable or not for your particular design at your operating frequency and rise/fall times. You must also remember to include fab house etching enhancements and meet their DFM requirements for a successful design. Mike Michael L. Conn Owner/Principal Consultant Mikon Consulting Cell: (408)821-9843 *** Serving Your Needs with Technical Excellence *** ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu