I thought Dr. Prince was suggesting the opposite. I am not sure about the special law because sophisticated software packages (neural networks ?) take over the show by then. Sainath -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Freeman Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:14 AM To: prince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: howiej@xxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: HSDD: Re: SI Position Open READ THIS!!!! The salary will be minimal and he will be reduced to slavery because of the needs of the masses. Remember that the EE will be a majority of one. There will also be a special law that if the EE messes up, some form of torture will be applied. Jim Freeman "Dr. John L. Prince" wrote: > The problem is one of positive feedback. As we get fewer and fewer > engineering profs who actually understand Ohm's law in its straightforward > form (no matrix notation) it naturally happens that curricula change in the > direction you and others mention. You can't teach what you don't know, and > you won't teach what you are not familiar with. I see no end to it. But > just think of the salary for the last EE left on earth!! John Prince > > At 10:13 AM 01/29/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >Dear Jim Freeman, > > > >I agree with you whole-heartedly that EE education is being > >shunted aside > >in favor of computer science at many universities. It's > >unfortunately, really, that > >educators have to make such decisions, but understandable of > >course. Out of > >the torrent of papers, conferences, and new information > >available each year they > >have to choose what is worthy of presentation to new > >students, and what has become > >"passe" or is available otherwise as "on-the-job" training. > >For example, at my > >alma matter Rice University I've heard rumors that the EE > >curriculum may soon be > >dropped or scaled back. From my perspective, eliminating > >subjects like transmission > >lines, electromagnetic fields, (low voltage) power > >distribution and interconnect > >modeling would be a mistake, but then I don't get to make > >such decisions (and I'm > >glad I don't have to). > > > >Clayton Paul has done a lot to popularize the teaching of > >EMC > >in colleges and universities with his textbook "Introduction > >to Electromagnetic > >Compatibility" and his persistent efforts within the IEEE to > >discuss EE > >curriculum. At this point I'm wondering who will step > >forward to do the same job > >for the field of signal integrity. > > > >Best regards, > >Dr. Howard Johnson, Signal Consulting Inc., > >tel 509-997-0505, howiej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >http:\\signalintegrity.com -- High-Speed Digital Design > >articles, books, tools, and seminars > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim > >Freeman > >Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 2:17 PM > >To: ventham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; owsley@xxxxxxxxx > >Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: SI Position Open READ THIS!!!! > > > > > > > >Hi All, > > Howard's article compares vintage with EMC. As one of > >the vintage engineers, > >I think the problem is really in the conversion from an > >emphasis on the > >ELECTRICAL in E.E. to an emphasis on computers in electrical > >engineering. Most > >engineers who graduate today think of electrons as an > >anachronism, if they think > >of them at all. > > As us vintage engineers remember, we were educated when > >the transition was > >occurring from motors, relays and tubes to a solid-state > >emphasis. We have > >performed our engineering job so well that those who > >practice engineering today > >don't worry about solid-state. it just works. We are > >generally in the same boat > >with today's engineers in regard to motor theory because it > >was being > >de-emphasized in our education. > > > >Thanks > >Jim Freeman > > > >Mike Ventham wrote: > > > >> Greetings All, > >> > >> I think Howard has now recognized vintage as being related > >to bald. > >> > >> See "NOT ALL EMC ENGINEERS ARE BALD" > >> Don't believe every myth you hear. > >> http://article.EDNMag.com/UM/T.ASP?A5.12.1729.9.1940859194 > >> > >> At 02:28 19/06/01, Bill Owsley wrote: > >> > >> >At 11:45 PM 06/18/2001 +0100, Mike Ventham wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > >The same seems to go for EMC engineers. I have met many > >who are 'old' > >> > > >> >the politically correct now use 'vintage' instead of > >'old' - like in wine... > >> >;> > >> > > >> > >analog engineers! > >> > > > >> > >At 23:19 18/06/01, you wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >i kinda get the feeling that its the other way > >around... a true SI > >> > guy is a > >> > > > > >> > > >microwave guy who's turned digital. ;-) all the > >digital guys that > >> > pick up > >> > > >on a little microwave are just SI wannabe's. > >> > > > > >> > > >miker > >> > > > > >> > > >p.s. i'm a digital guy and the above is said > >tongue-in-cheek. > >> > > > > >> > > >(snipped for bandwidth) > >> > > >> >---------------------------- > >> >Bill Owsley, owsley@xxxxxxxxx > >> >919) 392-8341 > >> > > >> >Compliance Engineer > >> >Cisco Systems > >> > > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Mike > >> > >____________________________________________________________ > >____ > >> | Mike Ventham - Vice-President Engineering, > >| > >> | Quantic EMC Inc. Headquarters > >| > >> | Croft House, Chilcompton, 191 Lombard Ave., > >Winnipeg,| > >> | Somerset, UK, BA3 4JA Manitoba, Canada R3B > >0X1 | > >> | Tel: 44 (0)1761 232191 Tel: (204) 942 4000 > >| > >> | Fax: 44 (0)7974 141685 Fax: (204) 957 1158 > >| > >> | Mobile: 44 (0)7971 553260 > >| > >> | Email: ventham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >http://www.quantic-emc.com | > >> > >> > >------------------------------------------------------------ > >------ > >> To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the > >Subject field > >> > >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > >> For help: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject > >field > >> > >> List archives are viewable at: > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> or at our remote archives: > >> > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------ > >------ > >To unsubscribe from si-list: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the > >Subject field > > > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > >For help: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject > >field > > > >List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >or at our remote archives: > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------ > >To unsubscribe from si-list: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > >or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > >For help: > >si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > >List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >or at our remote archives: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > >Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > John L. Prince, PhD > Professor > Director,Center for Electronic Packaging Research > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering > University of Arizona > 1230 E. Speedway > Tucson, AZ 85721-0104 > prince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 520-621-6187 > 520-621-2999(FAX) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu