[SI-LIST] Re: HDI and SERDES Channels

  • From: "Alfred P. Neves" <al@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: carson.au@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:29:56 -0700

Carson,
You can go around and around and worry about issues that are not important but 
miss issues that throttle your performance.   You don’t need smooth copper 
for 5Gbpsec for moderate to long traces since the Nyquist frequency is only 
2.5GHz.

Build a custom platform test vehicle using your stackup and copper that 
includes structures for material identification, loss model validation, via 
structures, SE and DIFF nets, along with a host of other structures providing 
validation of your 3D EM to measurement tool.   Send me a pm if you want help.  
 

- Al





       





Products for the Signal Integrity Practitioner



Alfred P. Neves
Chief Technologist

 

Office: 503-679-2429

www.wildrivertech.com <http://www.wildrivertech.com/>
 2015 Best In Design&Test Finalist








On Nov 3, 2016, at 1:19 PM, Carson Au <carson.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For example, let's just say some pedestrian 10Gb/s channels.
Are layer-transition via anti-pads important at those speeds? Can I
generally eliminate anti-pads for these channels to gain better routing
density?

If via stubs manifest themselves as losses on the channel, can I not care
about these stubs because now the SERDES receiver can recover from extreme
losses in the channel?



On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:10 AM, John <johndp@xxxxxxxx 
<mailto:johndp@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:

What is and what isn't important in your design is largely dependant on
the speed you want to go. So giving the list an indication of the operating
bit rate of your Serdes will enable us to better answer your question

Regards

John

Sent from my Sony Xperia™ smartphone


---- Carson Au wrote ----


If loss isn't usually the problem, does that mean usually smooth copper
usually doesn't have to be considered in the design (or are there more
benefits to smooth copper than just lower loss?)
Lee, what are the top problems in modern SERDES layout in your opinion
(besides the fibre weave effect)?

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Lee Ritchey <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:

Before I would do any of that, I would do some analysis to see what the
losses would be if normal striplines are used.  My experience is that
this
extra work would not be necessary.

-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;<mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
On
Behalf Of Loyer, Jeff (Redacted sender "jwloyer" for DMARC)
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 8:16 AM
To: carson.au@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:carson.au@xxxxxxxxx>; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: HDI and SERDES Channels

I think you'd have to void the layers above or below your signal traces.
For instance, I can imagine routing the longest lengths on the outermost
layers of the "core" of a build-up stackup and voiding layers above those
traces to allow me to widen the traces (they would also be relatively
thick,
further lowering loss).  You'd want a solid plane above them somewhere,
but
it doesn't have to be the adjacent layer.  You'd also have to be careful
to
specify smooth copper on those layers, else the manufacturer will
probably
undo your great efforts by putting rough copper on them.

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;<mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
On
Behalf Of Carson Au
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:07 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [SI-LIST] HDI and SERDES Channels

Hi Experts,
From my understanding, HDI build-up layers require thin prepreg layers,
leading to very thin trace widths for 100ohm differential impedance
control
- and your high speed serial links would suffer great conductor loss.

How do you mitigate against this?

If your design has many build-up layers with thin build-up layers on
either
side of your stripline, then it is impossible to even get something like
100um (4mil) trace widths for your 100 ohm differential pairs!!

Regards,
Carson


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
              http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:
               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list ;
<//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 
'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
              http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list ;
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>

List archives are viewable at:
               //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list ;
<//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
               http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ;<http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>





------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list ;
<//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 
'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
              http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list ;
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>

List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list ;
<//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ;<http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>




------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list ;
<//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list>

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> with 
'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
              http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list ;
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list>

List archives are viewable at:     
              //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list ;
<//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list>

Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
              http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ;<http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu>

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: