Another example of bandwidth trade-off between jitter accumulation vs. = jitter transfer. So, the question one more time. Why do people prefer jitter transfer = over jitter accumulation ? Is it because less people are aware of the = issue ? -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of istvan novak Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:54 AM To: Siddesh.V@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: al.neves@xxxxxxxxxxx; Mark.Randol@xxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ransom Stephens Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Good book about jitter.... Hi Siddesh, The Cypress book is a good overview of the various aspects of = clock-circuit designs. I particularly like Figures 5.4 and 5.5, providing measured = jitter data as a function of supply-rail noise frequency and magnitude. And I = also agree with the text going with the figures that this kind of data is=20 very rare on data sheets. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu