Thanks to everybody for the feedback. =46rom your replies, I got convinced that a GS probe is a better choice for PCB-level general applications (GSG may still be interesting for particular CPW situations). It comes out also that the pitch is very important : the lower it is the better it is, as is also pointed out in the Cascade application notes. But it is hard to find a source giving quantitative data to compare probes with different pitches. Is there anybody who can give me some light on this point ? My needs in bandwidth range from 5 GHz to 15 GHz. Thanks in advance, Luca PS for Manjusha : Cascade has good application notes (with references to IEEE articles) on its website about calibration procedures. On Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:50:42 -0500 "Manjusha Dawande" <manjusha_dawande@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > =20 >=20 > Hi,=20 >=20 > I would suggest you to select the pitch for GS or GSG probe carefully. Th= e > spacing between G-S or GSG depends on the properties of the board you are > using. I have simulated this pitch using HFSS by providing all the detail= s > ofthe board such as thickness, dielectric constant, loss tangent, conduct= or > thickness, Cu amount etc. This helps in accurate CPW measurement.=20 >=20 > By the way, can anyone tell me the correct procedure for TRL calibration > techniques if I want to design on CPW using GSG probes?=20 >=20 > Any good references on TRL? Feedback apprecited. >=20 > Thanks.=20 > Manju --=20 Luca Giacotto <lgiacott@xxxxxxxxx> ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu