This is getting interesting. =20 If I understood your stackup properly, Graham, I come up with a significantly different value with HyperLynx's 2D field solver. I get 54.4 Ohms. I'll send you a jpg of the stackup I'm looking at offline, and maybe you can tell me whether I've got it right. Why the 20% variation amongst the equation-based solvers? ... An interesting question for someone with the time to investigate would be where the equation-based results are breaking down. Eric Bogatin and others have compared the HyperLynx field solver with both Ansoft and bench measurements, finding the results to be within 1 percent across a wide range of standard PCB dimensions. =20 Doug commented: "As an added reference, the new Polar Quicksolver gives Zo for these dimensions as 47.38 Ohms" ...=20 So, that would be a 12 percent variation between the two field solvers here. =20 Can you run this in LineSim, Doug, and see if you get the same results that I do? Bill Hargin Product Manager - HyperLynx Mentor Graphics Corp. 425-497-5079 - Direct 425-301-4425 - Mobile > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20 > [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graham Davies > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 2:29 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Finding the impedance of a PCB trace >=20 > This is, of course, related to my search for a good 6-layer stackup. >=20 > What is the impedance of a PCB trace (microstrip) with the following > parameters: > Width ......................... 6.00 mil Height above return=20 > plane ..... 3.20 mil Thickness ..................... 1.35 mil=20 > (1 ounce copper) Dielectric rel. permittivity .. 4.2 >=20 > These are the answers I get from various tools: >=20 > 41... ohms (http://www.icd.com.au/) > 41.69 ohms (http://www.emclab.umr.edu/pcbtlc/microstrip.html) > 41.69 ohms (TraceSim version 1.0.0) > 41.69 ohms (http://www.technick.net/public/code/cp_dpage.php? > aiocp_dp=3Dutil_pcb_imp_calculator) > 41.7 .ohms (http://www.sunmantechnology.com/resources/cal_cat00.shtml) > 46.14 ohms (ZTOOL Impedance Calculator V1.2) > 47.31 ohms (http://www.rogers-corp.com/mwu/mwi_java/mwij_vp.html) > 50.89 ohms (http://www.csgnetwork.com/boardrunimpcalc.html) > 51.27 ohms (TxLine version 1.1) >=20 > Does anyone have an idea as to why these calculators give=20 > results that vary by 20% and which are more reliable? >=20 > Graham. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >=20 > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >=20 > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >=20 > List FAQ wiki page is located at: > http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ >=20 > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.org >=20 > List archives are viewable at: =20 > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > =20 >=20 >=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu