Hmmm. I thought the si-list was an open forum for exchange of technical information, not just an extension of somebody's license manager. I was really disappointed to see this thread get shut down before being addressed, especially since I already paid my HFSS maintenance fee and called the Apps Engineer (last week) and listened politely while he read me the brief text on Characteristic Impedance from the online HFSS Technical Notes, which I had already seen. In addition, I found the cited reference (Bianco et al, "Some considerations about the Frequency Dependency of the Characteristic Impedance of Uniform Microstrips," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol.MTT-26 No.3, March 1978) to be particularly uninsightful except for the observations that "it must be stressed that slightly different definitions ... yield strongly different behaviors" and "the above results show that particular care has to be taken both in computer calculations and in interpretation of experimental data to avoid confusion." This ambiguity is further highlighted by Getsinger ("Microstrip Characteristic Impedance" IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol.MTT-27, No.4, April 1979) who opens with "Bianco et al [1] have recently defined microstrip characteristic impedance in five ways, based on three definitions of voltage and one of current. They find that the different impedances do not have the same functional dependence on frequency. Since they do not discuss the merits of the differing definitions, the reader may assume that all are equally valid representations of microstrip characteristic impedance." I was unable to locate a copy of the second cited reference, Kuester et al, "Frequency-Dependent Definitions of Microstrip Characteristic Impedance" from the 1980 International URSI Symposium on Electromagnetic Waves, so I don't know if it clarifies this mater or not. So the question stands: How does one decide which impedance definition to use? If anyone understands this then I'd invite them to discuss it, via the si-list or direct, and I can send them my HFSS license file or whatever it takes to show that nobody's support revenue is being undermined. Of course, all this would be unnecessary if the HFSS documentation explained it clearly to begin with. Sincerely, Jonathan Fasig -----Original Message----- From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:Charles.Grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:00 PM To: 'mike_bihan@xxxxxxxxxxxx'; List` Si Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Question related to HFSS: Zpi, Zpv, Zvi difference Ok OK I'm gonna play the bad guy here. I would encourage the folks on the SI-List that use HFSS and (I assume) pay their maintenance fees- NOT to answer this type of technical question. Let me explain why. As a former Ansoft AE I have some insight into the costs involved in technical software support.=20 Ansoft - as do other EM Simulation companies employ Apps Engineers to answers exactly this kind of customer question. The companies that pay their maintenance fees get access to =20 Apps Engineers and software upgrades. The=20 maintainence fees also help fund the support function. So although its jolly tempting to display one's ability with a esoteric EM tool - I suggest that this undermines=20 the support process and should not be=20 encouraged in this forum. Best Regards Charles Grasso Senior Compliance Engineer Echostar Communications Corp. Tel: 303-706-5467 Fax: 303-799-6222 Cell: 303-204-2974 Email: charles.grasso@xxxxxxxxxxxx; =20 Email Alternate: chasgrasso@xxxxxxxx =20 -----Original Message----- From: Bi Han [mailto:mike_bihan@xxxxxxxxxxxx]=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 9:47 AM To: List` Si Subject: [SI-LIST] Question related to HFSS: Zpi, Zpv, Zvi difference Can any people tell me the difference between the three kinds of=20 characteristic impedance: Zpi, Zpv, Zvi. Manual had given out the definition of these parameters. Why I ask this question is that one HFSS simulation gives out very = different Zpi, Zpv, Zvi results. And Zpv is very close to 2D simulation result. The case is a CPW line. The results is that Zpi=3D296 Zpv=3D77 = Zvi=3D155. Why? Thanks! I need youe xp very much indeed! Bi,Hai =20 SJTU, Emlab =20 =20 --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? "=D1=C5=BB=A2=BD=DA=C8=D5=B4=F3=D7=AA=C5=CC=BE=AA=CF=B2=B2=BB=B6=CF = =BF=EC=C0=D6=BD=DA=C8=D5=BA=C3=C0=F1=C1=AC=C1=AC!" ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages=20 Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu