This another one of those times when if your are going to claim it, prove it with data. We have too many claims being posted on this forum with no accompanying proofs. That's not good engineering. > [Original Message] > From: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: Lee Ritchey <leeritchey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Robert Haller <rhaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 11/18/2009 7:49:18 PM > Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: FW: AC Blocking capacitor relative positions andreferenceplane voids > > Lee, the difference is readily seen in VNA measurements. Depending on > the signal spectra the eye is visibly impacted. > > Best Regards, > > > Steve. > Lee Ritchey wrote: > > This could be one of those cases where the effect was visible, but not > > significant. > > > > > > > >> [Original Message] > >> From: Haller, Robert <rhaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Date: 11/18/2009 1:34:29 PM > >> Subject: [SI-LIST] FW: AC Blocking capacitor relative positions > >> > > andreference plane voids > > > >> JF, > >> Depending on your specific high speed link requirements, voids under the > >> > > capacitors are an easy way to reduce the impedance discontinuity. We model > > this with a 3D Full Wave field solver. We also built up some structures in > > the lab and measured them (both in time and frequency Domains). > > > >> We were pleasantly surprised how much the reliefs helped and how well the > >> > > correlation to tools were. I wouldn't worry about the difference between a > > two cutouts versus a single void. If you can make the capacitor look like a > > 100Ohm transmission line (with no impedance discontinuity) then the > > placement isn't critical, but in practice it depends. I have seen some > > vendors specify lengths to avoid, because if the package length plus > > distance to the cap (and the associated discontinuity) are a multiple of > > the UI (unit interval of the LINK) undesirable resonances can occur. > > > >> Regards > >> Bob Haller > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> > > On Behalf Of jean-francois hasson > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:04 PM > >> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [SI-LIST] AC Blocking capacitor relative positions and reference > >> > > plane voids > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> When looking at AC coupling capacitors on high speed serial links it is > >> often recommended to void the reference plane under these capacitors to > >> minimize capacitance variations. Most of the times, in the designs I > >> have seen, the void is exactly underneath each AC blocking capacitor > >> including landing pads. If ever the capacitors were quite close, would > >> there be any reason why a single void below both capacitors would be an > >> issue ? I have also noticed that most of the times AC blocking > >> capacitors are not as close as possible to a transmitter or receiver > >> where I thought it was beneficial to do so to remove the number of > >> impedance disruptions ? Could anyone provide me with some explanation ? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> JF > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >> > >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > >> For help: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > >> > >> List technical documents are available at: > >> http://www.si-list.net > >> > >> List archives are viewable at: > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> To unsubscribe from si-list: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > >> > >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > >> > >> For help: > >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > >> > >> > >> List technical documents are available at: > >> http://www.si-list.net > >> > >> List archives are viewable at: > >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > >> > >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > >> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from si-list: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > > > For help: > > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > > > > List technical documents are available at: > > http://www.si-list.net > > > > List archives are viewable at: > > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu