Hi Chaz, I suspect most RF input/output semiconductors represent a excellent = protection device for a gas discharge device! ;-} General thoughts: Protecting an antenna path is tough. No way around it. The series high = Q inductor approach is terribly silly. The impulsive nature of ESD can = ring anything below a couple of GHz, so dissipative elements are the = only out. The frequency wasn't mentioned, but if high, could render = many of the garden variety semiconductor devices unusable due to = capacitive loading. Now the happy part; with the multi-billion dollar = cell phone industry driving device manufacturers, there are low = capacitance protection devices out there. A quick web search should = yield a few alternatives. Since I don't know anything about your application and ignorance is = bliss, there are also other things to be considered: - Is this direct discharge? Insulate the antenna. - Is there abundant signal? Pad down the antenna to reduce the ESD = amplitude. - Is the RF low frequency? Roll off the input seriously. - Is the RF narrow band? Use a dissipative band reject filter. Best of luck! Brent DeWitt -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Charles Grasso Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:40 PM To: sandord@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ibarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: ESD solution on antenna output Hi - Typically lighning protectors for antennas use some sort of =3D sparkgap/gas discgage tube to provide protection with low capacitance. I = =3D agree with the folks that advocate removal of the inductor..that will = =3D ring under ESD conditions and make the situation a lot worse! -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sandor Daranyi Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 5:10 PM To: Ibarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: ESD solution on antenna output Hello Ian, There are ESD suppressor components offered for RF applications, but of = =3D cou=3D3D rse they are highly dependent on the frequency, power, impedances etc. = =3D in=3D3D volved. These parameters were not detailed in your post, so with a stab = =3D i=3D3D n the dark for a small device with not very high frequency, there might = =3D b=3D3D e a relevant device at=3D3D20 http://www.spkecl.com/htdoc/over-voltage-protector-ESD-Guard.htm or =3D there a=3D3D re other similar offerings from Littelfuse or Bussmann and others. ...but this wasn't your question. You hinted at having a solution =3D yourself=3D3D , which involves removing the inductor. I have to agree. It's always = =3D tr=3D3D icky to make a meaningful comment without knowing the details (and I'm = =3D no=3D3D t an expert), but I don't see how the inductor could provide an ESD =3D solut=3D3D ion in that configuration, unless the frequency of transmission is very = =3D h=3D3D igh and it is guaranteed that there is not much ESD energy at =3D frequencies=3D3D approaching that. Ever. The noteworthy thing is that the most likely failure mode of the =3D inductor i=3D3D s open, which might keep the device operating, but it can then be =3D (perhap=3D3D s fatally) damaged by the next serious ESD event that comes along. What actual (physics based) explanation has your colleague offered for = =3D the =3D3D inductor, apart from that all ESD experts use it? It suspiciously =3D sounds=3D3D like it is something that is appropriate under some specific =3D circumstanc=3D3D es, and has then been applied because "experts do it". People can get = =3D to=3D3D uchy when they are asked about something they've done that they don't = =3D tot=3D3D ally understand why... Of course, we never see that on this forum!!! = =3D ;-=3D3D ) Regards, Sandor Daranyi Senior Design Engineer Ian Barrett wrote: > I am currently having a lively discussion with a colleague about an = =3D ESD > problem we have encountered. The trouble is I don't think either of = =3D us=3D3D20 > know > enough to be able to convince the other of our point of view. > > The product is a small radio transmitter that is very susceptible =3D to=3D3D20 > an ESD > spike applied directly to it's antenna. The design includes a = small=3D20 > inductor > between the antenna output and ground. My colleague (the designer) put = =3D it > there to try and alleviate any potential ESD problems. I have = found=3D20 > that I > cannot solve the ESD susceptibility problem without removing it. > > He claims 'any ESD experts will tell you to place this inductor' = and=3D20 > wants > me to try and find another solution to the problem. But I think = the=3D20 > inductor > is making the situation worse by coupling the ESD spike onto the =3D ground > plane. > > Can anyone offer some theory to back up either argument? > > Ian. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: =3D20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =3D20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu