Hi what Dk value to use for PCB trace impedance calculation? I thought, I would use the measured Dk values recalculated to a suitable high frequency. 2GHz, because the Polar software uses the same frequency for skin-effect-based RL calculation. These values are different for each thickness-option or glass-style for each material. For example Isola supplies this data, because they did VNA measurements. Then I compensate Dk @ 1MHz (or Dk @ 1GHz) to Dk @ 2GHz based on some equations about Dk/Df frequency dependence (check this: http://www.buenos.extra.hu/iromanyok/E_r_frequency_compensation.xls ). We wanted to use a new PCB manufacturer, who actually told me that they did extensive evaluations, and the result was that they have to use Dk=3.5 for each material, each glass-style, each signal. As a reason, they were talking about thinkness tolerances, match-with-measurement, tolerances in resin content, copper-embedding, and "other" parameters. They say if I use Dk from Isola, then it will be "wrong", and will not match with their TDR measurements. Who has right? I think if a variable has a distribution (not a fixed number), it still has a mean value, so its worth using its mean value. the mean value is the supplied Dk data. Istvan Nagy Concurrent Technologies Plc, UK ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu