Jeff I stand corrected. What I mean is that the dielectric losses will dominate over copper losses at the higher frequencies on wider traces. Jeff please refer to Istvans comment. This to me means there is a point of diminishing returns on going wider. If I can I will normally pick a trace width where the copper loss is about equal to the dielectric loss. Leonard.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Loyer, Jeff [mailto:jeff.loyer@xxxxxxxxx]=20 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:23 AM To: Leonard Dieguez Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: Disadvantages of wider traces Can you point me to some data that shows wider traces have higher dielectric loss? My experiments to date don't show that. =20 http://pcdandm.com/cms/content/view/2572/95/ Jeff Loyer -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Leonard Dieguez Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:46 PM To: babid_a@xxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Disadvantages of wider traces It depends on the operational bit rates of the signals on that trace. Wider traces do give lower skin losses, but dielectric losses will increase and will eventually dominate at a given frequency for a given material and trace width. Therefore at a bit rate (Gbps) adding trace width will actually increase losses. =3D20 I also agree with Istvan with his comments on routing density and crosstalk. With today's high pin count devices that aspect cannot be ignored.=3D20 Leonard Dieguez Cat herder Video: Crazy cat women! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3DafpTHe91KFc =3D20 -----Original Message----- From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Babid A Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:28 PM To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [SI-LIST] Disadvantages of wider traces Hello, Assuming that there is a chance for routing traces as wide as possible, what are the disadvantages of having wider traces on the boards (>12mil) in respect to noise, jitter etc? -Thanks, =3D20 --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: =3D20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =3D20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: =20 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu =20 ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu