[SI-LIST] Re: Differential signals - skew - and EMC

  • From: Ravinder.Ajmani@xxxxxxxx
  • To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:08 -0800

Hi Steve,
I agree.  However I believe when Eric talks of tight return path, he 
assumes that there are no return path discontinuities like slots. 

Regards
Ravinder Ajmani
HGST, a Western Digital Company
5601 Great Oaks Pkwy
San Jose, CA 95119-1003
ravinder.ajmani@xxxxxxxx




steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
11/04/2013 10:45 AM
Please respond to
weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx


To
si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
[SI-LIST] Re: Differential signals - skew - and EMC






Eric, those are all good points.  The only exception that I take is to 
statements about signals with tight return paths not radiating.  They do 
radiate.  They don't radiate excessively.  Doing foolish things like 
passing signals, including differential signals, over slots increases 
radiated power.

Olive oil entrepreneur and sometimes EMC engineer Don Corleone to his 
son:  "Keep your signal paths close.  Keep your return paths closer."

Best Regards,


Steve
On 11/4/2013 8:32 AM, Eric Bogatin wrote:
> Hi folks-
> 
>
> Here is an EDN blog I wrote a few weeks ago related to common currents 
and
> Charles Grasso's question about how much is too much.
>
> 
>
> 
http://www.edn.com/electronics-blogs/test-voices/4420453/Not-all-common-curr

> ents-are-bad
>
> 
>
> 
>
> In my Advanced GigaBit Channel Design class, we go through the numbers. 
Here
> is the brief analysis:
>
> 
>
> It takes about 3 uA of common current on Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) 
cable
> to fail FCC part 15 class B at about 100 MHz on a 1 m long external 
cable.
>
> 
>
> It takes about 1 mV of common signal driving the cable to drive 3 uA and
> fail the test.
>
> 
>
> If the diff signal is 600 mV (like PCIe II), this is -55 dB of mode
> conversion from the source to the UTP front end to fail a radiated 
emissions
> test.
>
> 
>
> How can any product ship with an RJ45 connector for UTW cables if this 
is
> the limit to mode conversion, at the ~ 100 MHz point?
>
> 
>
> The solution is common mode chokes. With a 40 dB isolation, this allows 
as
> much as -15 dB mode conversion before the common currents that get 
through
> cause EMI problems.
>
> 
>
> However, even with shielded twisted pair, a bad connector negates the 
value
> of the shield proving the return for the common signal.
>
> 
>
> How much radiated emissions you get is a function of how 360 degrees the
> connector is, hard to predict.
>
> 
>
> This is why, as a "habit", do everything that is free to minimize
> asymmetries. When it cost more, use analysis to calculate the bang for 
the
> buck.
>
> 
>
> This is just one example of how common currents on external cables can 
cause
> radiated emissions.
>
> 
>
> --eric
>
> 
>
> 
>
> 
>
> *******************************************************
> Dr. Eric Bogatin, Signal Integrity Evangelist
>
> Bogatin Enterprises
>
> Setting the Standard for Signal Integrity Training
> web site:  <http://www.bethesignal.com/> www.beTheSignal.com
>
> Blog:  <http://www.bethesignal.com/blog> www.beTheSignal.com/blog
>
> Twitter @beTheSignal
> e:  <mailto:eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Laboratory:  Connected Community Networks
>
> 105 S Sunset St, Suite J
>
> Longmont, CO 80501 USA
>
> cell: 913-424-4333  skype: eric.bogatin
> ***********************************************
>
> 
>
> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On
> Behalf Of Grasso, Charles
>
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 12:32 PM
>
> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Subject: [SI-LIST] Differential signals - skew - and EMC
>
> 
>
> Hello,
>
> 
>
> In an ideal situation differential signals will have no skew through the
> transmission path and (as I understand it) the common-signal (emi) will 
be
> very low as a result.  Given that EMC is very system dependent - does 
any
> one have a rule of thumb or anxiety(!) factor for how much is skew is
> tolerable before becoming an emissions (regulatory) Issue?
>
> 
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Charles Grasso
>
> 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from si-list:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>
> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>
> For help:
> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>
>
> List forum  is accessible at:
>                 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list
>
> List archives are viewable at:
>                                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
> 
> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>                                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
> 
>
>


-- 
Steve Weir
IPBLOX, LLC
1580 Grand Point Way
MS 34689
Reno, NV  89523-9998
www.ipblox.com

(775) 299-4236 Business
(866) 675-4630 Toll-free
(707) 780-1951 Fax

All contents Copyright (c)2013 IPBLOX, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
This e-mail may contain confidential material.
If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all records
and notify the sender.

------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at: 
                                 //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                                 http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
 




------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List forum  is accessible at:
               http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
 
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts: