On Aug 17, 2011 11:14 PM, "bala" <balaseven@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Rajesh...one thing on the SI its always depends on the substrate and > speed...no formula like ohms law...it depends...material is first think,dont > send data with high speed and dont specify distance and space.finally to > avoid crosstalk 4x or some x is no mattet analyze the channel with > speed.thats my answer. > On Aug 17, 2011 6:47 PM, <J_Dong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Rajesh, >> I am not a SI expert, but I think this is too general a matter to be >> answered explicitly. The coupling or isolation between two adjacent pcb >> traces could largely depend on the >> >> 1. freq. Assuming microstrip pcb, different freq will give different >> fringing field distributions around the trace as well as see different >> effective trace spacing, which would result in different couplings. >> >> 2. the load of each trace. Depending on whether you have matched or >> discontinuities along either trace, resonant modes might be created. In > some >> filter design, you can even achieve 99% coupling between two tracings even >> you have pretty wide trace spacing. >> >> 3. other physical identifies like dielectric constant of the substrate, >> height of the board etc. Those factors affect aforementioned issues too. >> >> The best solution to that is to turn to the "virtual reality"! The ever >> growing solvers based on numerous types of numerical techniques (FEM, > Finite >> Difference, MoM, etc) could accurately solve the Maxwell equations for >> arbitrary geometries. You give it a 2D/2D geometry and right boundary >> conditions, it gives you a right answer. Products range from 0 dollars > (e.g. >> GMSH, GetDP http://www.geuz.org/getdp/) to a few tens of thousands of >> dollars (e.g. HFSS, CST, etc) are options for people to choose. For this >> particular question, I would just suggest getting a free trial version of >> some commercial software is sufficient, for example free trail FEKO at >> http://www.feko.info/. >> >> Hope it helps. >> >> Junwei Dong >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On >> Behalf Of steve weir >> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 4:20 AM >> To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [SI-LIST] Re: Cross talk and Trace length >> >> Your question fills a good chapter in many of the texts out there such >> as "Signal Integrity Simplified" Bogatin, "High Speed Digital Design" >> Johnson, etc. There are also excellent web tutorials. >> >> Steve. >> On 8/17/2011 12:19 AM, rajesh kumar wrote: >>> Hello SI Gurus, >>> Please share your thoughts on the relationship between >> cross >>> talk and trace length. In general i consider that the spacing between >> trace >>> is the main factor that influences cross talk. Still now i assume that 4X >>> spacing between traces (X is a trace width) is a good way to avoid cross >>> talk irrespective of the length of trace. Please share your views on > this. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rajesh >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Steve Weir >> IPBLOX, LLC >> 150 N. Center St. #211 >> Reno, NV 89501 >> www.ipblox.com >> >> (775) 299-4236 Business >> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free >> (707) 780-1951 Fax >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu