Okay, now I really need some coffee ... and it's 5:30 in the evening. Here's yet another correction and more elaboration. A square patch of copper on top of a dielectric and plane forms a crude cavity resonator which will have a number of natural resonant eigenmodes. The first resonant point is a half-wave resonance. The resonance frequency is equal to the round trip of a wave propagating back and forth across the region, much like what would happen in a square pool of water between the two walls. For a one square inch patch of copper, the resonant frequency on FR-4 is somewhere between 2.7 and 3.3 GHz A very crude square patch w -------------- | | resonant frequency = 1/( 2 * w * Vp) | | Vp = velocity of propagation of wave in dielectric medium = c/sqrt(Er) | | w = width and height of square | | | | --------------- Adding vias to the patch effectively pins the structure down and raises it's resonant frequency. The spacing of the vias control the resonance, with a half-wave resonance being the lowest generally supported by the structure. Stitching the patch at all four corners actually does nothing to change the resonant frequency of the cavity. However, placing a fifth via at the center will push the resonance up by a factor of 2. w @------------@ | | resonant frequency = 1/( 4 * w * Vp) | | Vp = velocity of propagation of wave in dielectric medium | @ | w = width and height of square | | @ = Via stitch | | @------------@ In essence, the via spacing has changed from w to w/2. These formulas are quite approximate, but will place us in the general playing field. A full-wave field solver such as PowerSI from Sigrity, or SIwave and HFSS from Ansoft, will provide much more exact resonance frequency analysis. So, the "rough" formula I gave for via spacing should be: via spacing =1/(2 * (f * Vp)) not 2/(f * Vp) as I had indicated. In my previous example, this would amount to a via spacing of 0.59 inches, not 1.18. Sorry about my confusion. Scott -- Scott McMorrow Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC 2926 SE Yamhill St. Portland, OR 97214 (503) 239-5536 http://www.teraspeed.com Scott McMorrow wrote: > My equation below has an error. > > The maximum via spacing should be: > > 2/(f * Vp) > > This accounts for the half-wave resonance which occurs between vias. > > > regards, > > Scott > > > Scott McMorrow wrote: > >> Ray, >> >> When the separation of the copper fill from any signal is > 20 times >> the signal-to-plane spacing there is no effect on the signals. So, >> for 5 mil dielectric thickness, the fill area to signal trace >> clearance should be 100 mils or greater. I would also suggest >> grounding each fill area at multiple points to eliminate possible EMI >> coupling problems.. At a minimum, use ground stitch vias at four >> corners to contain resonances of the fill area. For extremely high >> speed multi-gigahertz systems, the vias should be spaced a maximum >> distance apart of 1/(f * Vp) apart. Where f = the upper frequency of >> operation and Vp is the velocity of propagation of signals within the >> dielectric. >> >> For FR4 Vp is around 180ps/in. For 3.125 Gbps signallling the upper >> frequency you are concerned with is the 3rd harmonic of the switching >> frequency, 4.68 GHz. In this case, the maximum stitch via spacing >> would be >> 1/(4.68e9 * 180e-12) = 1.18 inches. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Scott >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu