Hello, just as short feedback to Ravva's answer: 1) The die capacitance(C_Comp) in the IBIS is the parasitic input capacitance due to ESD, routing, Driver, Receiver .. It is NOT the decoupling capacitor between VDDQ and VSSQ! 4) I agree that a full 3D solve is too big for the system I'm expecting. There are other tools out that will do this job better. As ADS user I would give Momentum a try .. Hermann Our next Events: ================ Signal Ingegrity Seminar "Open the Black Box of Signal Integrity" at TH Aalen on 29th October 2011 Visit us on Embedded World 2012 Our location Hall 1 / Booth 509 Check our website or contact us for details EKH - EyeKnowHow Hermann Ruckerbauer www.EyeKnowHow.de Hermann.Ruckerbauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Veilchenstrasse 1 94554 Moos Tel.: +49 (0)9938 / 902 083 Mobile: +49 (0)176 / 787 787 77 Fax: +49 (0)3212 / 121 9008 schrieb Poorna Chander Ravva: > Hi Cris, > 1. As far as I know the IBIS model should include the one die capacitance > > 2. May be you can just confirm with the silicon vendor > > 3. Also the frequency range of the anti resonance for your PDN is > important. If the resonance is generally around 1GHz range, then it might > be contributed because of the lack of the on die capacitance.. if the > resonance is much much lower in frequency it is contributed by either the > lack of your package capacitance (since you did not include that anyway) > and or board capacitance > > 4. Regarding the HFSS simulation: if you are generating your whole power > delivery network model in HFSS it would be very difficult to solve. I > would use tools like PowerSI or Ansoft SIwave to generate the PDN models > and then incorporate the connector models from the HFSS into your final > SSN SPICE simulation... > > Thanks, > PoornaChander Ravva > > >> Hi folks >> >> thanks for your feedback. >> I had to reduce the number of power pins in HFSS simulation otherwise the >> full 3D model with all power pins was to huge to simulate. >> >> So I reduced 46 pwr needles of I/O pwr to only 6 around of my total 10 I/O >> I'm simulating for SSN. >> >> Cheers >> Cris >> Inviati dal mio telefono Nokia >> ----Messaggio Originale---- >> Da: Michael Greim >> Inviati: 16/10/2011, 15:13 >> A: steve weir >> Cc: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Oggetto: [SI-LIST] Re: Chip capacitance effect for SSN simulation >> >> >> Great points Steve (as always). Cristian, a simulation >> is only as good as its ability to properly mirror the actual >> correlated test setup. As you strip this that and the other >> thing out, the sim and the hardware behavior will become very >> different from one another. Set up some test cases with >> your queries and see if the behaviors are convergent or >> divergent. >> Why did you "have to" reduce the number of power pins? >> >> Build up a better relationship with your vendor and tell them >> what you are looking for and why and you might be quite >> surprised what they give you. Perhaps even an RLC matrix >> or two and with a story relating of other customers who have >> run into similar issues. >> >> Check out my quote from Mr fleischmann below. Works >> great for a number of things in real life and the simulated >> behavior thereof including SI/PI sims......... >> >> -Michael. >> >> We will either find a way or make one -Hannibal >> >> In the middle of every difficulty lies opportunity -Al Einstein >> >> If you're not getting the results you want with the >> current approach, move on and try something else. -A. Fleischmann >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:39 AM, steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> You need a model of the silicon that includes the on-die capacitance. >>> You can try to obtain this, or if it is not available, then derive it >>> from measurements. The complexity of the model that you construct >>> depends on how much accuracy you need. You will still face the same >>> challengess as others in the ATE business when dealing with the parallel >>> bus structure of DRAM switching with very small rise and fall times, and >>> the inductance of your probing interconnects. >>> >>> Steve. >>> >>> On 10/16/2011 2:25 AM, Cristian Gozzi wrote: >>>> Hi SI members >>>> I'm simulating DDR2 SSN for a Probe Card system >>>> >>>> for those that are not familiar with this application, Probe Card is >>> an >>>> hardware application to physical connect DIE pads/bumps at wafer level >>> to >>>> ATE system during Electric Wafer Sort >>>> In my case Probe-Card is build by a vertical needles that touch DIE >>> pads >>> + >>>> PCB >>>> >>>> During frequency domain analysis of my system, I got a strong PDN peak >>>> impedance around 1GHz >>>> This peak impedance was due to anti-resonance effect between PCB PDN >>> system >>>> and needle PWR parasitic effect >>>> >>>> so during time domain analysis I got a strong and unreasonable AC >>> noises >>>> also with only 2 switching DQ >>>> >>>> In my spice deck I only used IBIS model provided by silicon vendor and >>> I >>>> excluded RLC package effects, since my application is contacting >>> directly >>>> wafer. >>>> >>>> I think I should include chip power rail capacitance effect in order >>> to >>>> filter high freq noises. >>>> >>>> But my question is: which C and R value should I use? >>>> >>>> Is these value included in IBIS model? >>>> >>>> NOTE: consider that I had to reduce number of PWR needles used for >>> HFSS >>>> simulation, so I only selected those needles around my 8 DQ + 2 DQS >>>> >>>> So I think I should put a lower value of chip capacitance than total >>> one >>>> Any comments from expert are more than welcome >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Cris >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>>> >>>> For help: >>>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>>> >>>> >>>> List technical documents are available at: >>>> http://www.si-list.net >>>> >>>> List archives are viewable at: >>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>>> >>>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Steve Weir >>> IPBLOX, LLC >>> 150 N. Center St. #211 >>> Reno, NV 89501 >>> www.ipblox.com >>> >>> (775) 299-4236 Business >>> (866) 675-4630 Toll-free >>> (707) 780-1951 Fax >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> To unsubscribe from si-list: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >>> >>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >>> >>> For help: >>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >>> >>> >>> List technical documents are available at: >>> http://www.si-list.net >>> >>> List archives are viewable at: >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >>> >>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To unsubscribe from si-list: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field >> >> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: >> //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list >> >> For help: >> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field >> >> >> List technical documents are available at: >> http://www.si-list.net >> >> List archives are viewable at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list >> >> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: >> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu