Mario, There is lot of device physics involved in modeling capacitors. Just to be precise on Si-list I would say that as far as tantalum caps are concerned, we just use RLC model. ESR which stands for equivalent series resistance is a function of frequency and this particular values varies a lot based on the measurement technique used. To accurately model a capacitor it is very essential that we characterize capacitors in-house and try extracting parameters of interest from the mesaured results. To model a cap we usually use ESR at resonant frequency which we can easily extract from measured results. Try simulating model using Hspice and you should definitely get good model to hardware correlation. Usually I have seen that for X7r and X5r caps we can get real good model to hardware correlation, but for bulk caps or tantalum caps model correlation is pretty close, but not as good as X7r or X5r. I am not sure how widely these caps are used as ceramic caps take over at high frequencies and at low frequency people now tend to use polymer caps. Also with polymer caps I am not very satisfied with modeling results as compared to X7r or X5r. I get pretty close results, but not exactly overlapping the measured results. Can somebody give me a little input on type of model to use or can guide me to some papers which discusses modeling of polymer/tantalum caps? I also agree with you Mario, that lot of spec sheets for tantalum caps show ESR at 100 KHz (max) because that's the maximum ESR shown by the supplier for a particular value of capacitor at 100 KHz. For e.g. 33uf capacitor shows ESR of 4 ohms at 100 KHz (max), which means that maximum ESR achieved is 4 ohms at 100 KHz, we can get low ESR as well, but it is guaranteed that we will never see beyond 4 ohms at 100 KHz. Please correct me if anybody feels that this is an incorrect statement. Thanks, Krina Kothari --- mappiani@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Is a cap's ESR value specified at it's resonant > freq? I seem to remember > seeing some spec sheet for tantalum caps specifying > an ESR value at 100KHz. > > I was trying to model up a power input filter and > for the capacitors and I > realized that I didn't really understood where the > ESR number came from. I > wanted to use the ESR at my frequency of interest > but that didn't seem > right for a cap model. I get that ESL is tied to the > package size and > pretty well fixed but I 'm not sure about what ESR > value to use. > > Thanks for any input. > > MArio > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in > the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go > to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the > Subject field > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > or at our remote archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are > viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu