Many thanks to all who replied, both to the list and personally. I appreciate your time. Hope i can post some useful (??) findings at some point. Cheers! Karthik On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Lambert Simonovich < bertsimonovich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Karthik, > > For high speed design in the GHz regime, excess via capacitance is the > issue. The distributed capacitance associated with the via anti-pads of > each > reference layer over the length of the vias that affect the its impedance. > The closer the antipad is to the via barrel, the higher the capacitance and > the lower effective via impedance. The lower impedance causes an impedance > mismatch and translates into noise in the form of reflections and > potentially lower BER performance. > > Usually, the practice is to make the anti-pad as large as possible without > compromising routability of other nearby traces. I.E. any traces routed > near > the via that needs a good reference plane for return current. More often > than not, the component footprint will determine maximum antipad > dimensions. > If there are no mechanical restrictions, there will usually be a sweet spot > where increasing the antipad size beyond a certain diameter diminishes any > further advantage. In any event, a 3D field solver is needed to determine > this sweet spot if the design is that critical. Often oval anti-pads are > used when there are routing restrictions for example backplane connector > pinfield footprints. > > Finally, if your design has long via stubs (not a good idea for muti-Gb > links), this excess distributed capacitance in the stub section will > translate into a higher effective dielectric constant, and tend to lower > the > 1/4-wave resonant frequency caused by the length of the stub. Resonant > frequencies at or near 1/2 the bit-rate will destroy the received eye. > Minimizing via stubs through back-drilling is a common practice and is the > best thing you can do to improve channel response even more so than > maximizing the anti-pads. > > Regards, > > Bert Simonovich > Backplane Specialist and Founder > LAMSIM Enterprises Inc. > http://lamsimenterprises.com/index.html > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On > Behalf Of Karthik Raj Guruchandran > Sent: March-08-10 12:16 PM > To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [SI-LIST] Antipad dimensions > > Hello all, > What would you consider to be the most important factors that would have an > impact on antipad clearance dimension (in vias), apart from fabricators > capability? In other words, what do we need to consider to determine > antipad > clearance dimension? > > I am trying to put together an article on the effect of antipad dimensions > on energy transfer (by looking at s-parameters) and see some interesting > simulation results. > > Thanks, > Karthik > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from si-list: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field > > or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list > > For help: > si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field > > > List technical documents are available at: > http://www.si-list.net > > List archives are viewable at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list > > Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: > http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2727 - Release Date: 03/08/10 > 02:34:00 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu