Hi Zaiyi, Most of the handheld probes are built for oszilloscope usage only. There are some very robust chip probes that can be positioned by hand without breaking them at the first attempt (google: Z-Probes). Another very nice and high bandwidth handhelt probe is available by Gigaprobes: http://gigaprobes.com/ Unfortunately they do ot sell calibration substrates that allow calibrating right at the tip of the probe, but you can get those from a chip-probe vendor if needed. Regarding your second question I think the main difference is speed or ease of operation. The VNA gives you the S-Parameters (at least s2p) within seconds. Going with round robin to get the differential s-parameters takes 6 measurements, which is a bit more time consuming. Multiport VNAs will give you the differential data within seconds. Using TDR, you need 2 measurements for s2p parameter calculation (TDR and TDT), which is done with one measurement setup (just saving two different files). Using round robin thats 16 measurements. Then you need to do the post processing to get S-parameters from the time domain data. The accuracy should be the same for VNA and TDR as long as you are within the dynamic range (which is much higher for VNAs). Pricing might also be different. When we bought our equipment, the 4-Port VNA was much more expensive than the 4-Port TDR Setup, but I don't know the current pricing. I hope this helps BR Gert -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH & Co. KG; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Espelkamp; Registergericht: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRA 5596; persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: HARTING Electronics Management GmbH; Sitz der Komplementär-GmbH: Espelkamp; Registergericht der Komplementär-GmbH: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr. der Komplementär-GmbH: HRB 8808; Geschäftsführer: Torsten Ratzmann -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Zaiyi Liao Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Januar 2010 04:46 An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: [SI-LIST] Question about diff-probes Hello experts: Now I want to test S-parameter of diff-channel on PCB. I find it's hard to find portable low-impedance(50ohm) diff-probe for VNA. As I know,there are some diff-probes up to 15Ghz (such as N1020A TDR probe) for TDR test. And there are lot of high-impedance diff-probes for eyepattern test up to 10Ghz. In chip test, there are many low-impedance probes(GSG,GSGSG,GSSG,etc) I want to know whether there is any portable(no need probe station) diff-probe for VNA?? Why it's hard to find low-impedance probe for PCB test? Another question is that what is the differences of S-parameter test by VNA and TDR. Thank you very much! BR//Zaiyi Liao ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.net List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu