[SI-LIST] AW: Low permittivity vs. High permittivity

  • From: "Havermann, Gert" <Gert.Havermann@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Jennifer Maharani" <jennifer.maharani@xxxxxxxxx>, si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:50:40 +0200

Dear Jennifer,

the impedance, velocity of propagation and wavelength of the travelling wave 
changes with the materials used:
v=c/SQR(dk)
wavelength=c/f*SQR(dk)
Z=Z0/SQR(dk)

That means, that the density of your circuit can be higher, the higher your 
permitivity (dk) is. You can use smaller traces and less dielectric thickness 
while having the same impedance, when switching to a higher dk.

If you choose to reduce the layer stack and use higher dk material to 
kompensate for it, then you would also reduce the crosstalk between the traces 
on the board, because the electric field will be more dense due to shorter 
GND-plane distance.

BR
Gert


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Absender ist HARTING Electronics GmbH & Co. KG; Sitz der Gesellschaft: 
Espelkamp; Registergericht: Bad Oeynhausen; Register-Nr.: HRA 5596; persönlich 
haftende Gesellschafterin: HARTING Electronics Management GmbH; Sitz der 
Komplementär-GmbH: Espelkamp; Registergericht der Komplementär-GmbH: Bad 
Oeynhausen; Register-Nr. der Komplementär-GmbH: HRB 8808; Geschäftsführer: 
Torsten Ratzmann
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

Von: si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:si-list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Jennifer Maharani
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 07:55
An: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [SI-LIST] Low permittivity vs. High permittivity 

Dear all,

I understand that higher subtrate permittivity the more capacitive it is, which 
means the more capacitive coupling will be introduced. This is obviously bad 
particularly for structures like multi transmission line.

What is then the advantage of higher permittivity substrate like silicon over 
lower permittivity substrate like glass?

Many thanks,
Jenni
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  


------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field

or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list

For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field


List technical documents are available at:
                http://www.si-list.net

List archives are viewable at:     
                //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
                http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
  

Other related posts:

  • » [SI-LIST] AW: Low permittivity vs. High permittivity - Havermann, Gert