Chris Chalmers wrote: > SI, > > This is theoretical. Is there any point in > putting standard 0603 0.1uF capacitors (SRF ~ 12MHz) on to > decouple a clock oscillator that is producing a pure > 60MHz Sine wave. To my mind there would be no point > because 0.1uF caps won't have the low impedance we > want at that frequency. Is this correct? > > Thanks in advance > > Chris > Chris- Depending on the actual circuit used to implement your 60 MHz oscillator, if it is not sufficiently decoupled over a broad range of frequencies (at low frequencies and at higher frequencies) it _may_ be prone to spurious oscillation at undeisered frequencies. In adequate decoupling of oscillators has also been know to induce oscillator startup problems in some circuits. Also note that having good decoupling at frequencies lower than the operating frequency of the oscillator will help to keep lower frequency noise present on the power planes out of the oscillator and can assist in maintaining a clean spectral output from the oscillator. Also note that your presumed SRF of 12 MHz for the .1uF decap presumes a total mounted loop inductance of about 1.7nH. This is indeed possible, however much higher mounted inductances are also possible depending on the mounting geometries and via escapes in which case the SRF could be somewhat lower than 12 MHz. -Ray Anderson Sun Microsystems Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki page is located at: http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical documents are available at: http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu