[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: was Congo, everyone go out and buy latches

  • From: Pinehillgsds@xxxxxxx
  • To: dgshwpromo@xxxxxxxxx, showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:57:18 EST

 
In a message dated 11/19/2007 10:02:56 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
dgshwpromo@xxxxxxxxx writes:
In the  original email on Congo, Zoe was clear that 1) the gardner, while 
illegal and  not English speaking was spoken to by the owner in Spanish, there 
was no  misunderstanding.  and 2) the gardner climbed over the fence, not 
through  a gate, to 'start work' and that he was confronted by the puppies whom 
he  
started beating with a rake.  This drew the wife's and sire's attention  to 
the outside and where the comotion was.




That's not even close. It has been in all of our local papers and there are  
at least 4 versions by now.  The most popular is that there was a  language 
barrier AND the gate was open AND the wife and possibly one puppy were  outside 
of the "traditionally fenced" area.  (Guess that electric part  didn't work so 
well, huh?)
 
Here, from the Trentonian:  
"James has taken great pains to point out that, even though the gate to his  
fenced-in yard has been left open in the past, the dogs have been trained not 
to  leave the property.  
Kathy here...yeah right...puppies?  Must be some KIND of dog  
trainer....continuing from the Trentonian: 
He said they also have electronic sensors that shock them when they approach  
an invisible fence along the propertyâ??s perimeter. 
Kathy here...how's THAT working for you?...continuing.... 
However, Elizabeth James had that morning been out searching for one of the  
puppies, which had strayed into that territory between the conventional and  
invisible fences, James has acknowledged. 
Kathy here...didn't see THAT coming...continuing... 
The workers, all agree, got out of their car upon seeing Elizabethâ??s vehicle, 
 and the dogs, which had been feeding in a rear yard, came around to 
investigate.  About here, the two sides of the story diverge." 
******************************************************************************
******************** 
So, a puppy got out, the lady was searching the neighborhood for it, the  
"traditional" gate was open, yada yada.
 
My point was, to avoid anyone being able to open your gate put latches  on 
the insides of your gates.  It doesn't exactly parallel the above, in  which 
the 
traditionally fenced area was by all accounts, open, there was an  electric 
fence which was ineffective (duh!), but for anyone who wants to be  cautious, 
latches are a good idea.
 
Congo's story was complicated because a gate was open which I'm betting  (and 
it's a pretty good bet) is why there was liability. (BTW, I have fences  that 
can't be "climbed" without a ladder.)  If the party in question had  
effective fencing this never would have happened.
 
Kathy, member GSDCA, DVGSDC
Celebrating generations of Dual Titled TC'd  Champions

visit www.geocities.com/pinehillgsds 



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: