[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: unite
- From: "Robert Dir" <dir@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <RFWFORGSD@xxxxxxx>, <zlrockenstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <sally@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <dgshwpromo@xxxxxxxxx>, <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:53:39 -0600
Thanks Dick--good post. Sandi Card
----- Original Message -----
From: <RFWFORGSD@xxxxxxx>
To: <zlrockenstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <sally@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
<dgshwpromo@xxxxxxxxx>; <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Bokenkampgsd1@xxxxxxx>; <sharlen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<campaigners@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <cbattaglia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<CROSSTIMBR@xxxxxxx>; <DaniaKarloff@xxxxxxx>; <helengleasonus@xxxxxxxxx>;
<GreyPines@xxxxxxx>; <magic4sure@xxxxxxxxx>; <rivendellp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<TISHW@xxxxxxx>; <f.fasano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ghardcastle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<marhaven@xxxxxxx>; <vonnassau@xxxxxxx>; <mgolant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
<PAGAIRS@xxxxxxx>; <nancy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <LEWIEB@xxxxxxx>;
<GSDCHABLIS@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:59 PM
Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: unite
>
> Zoa,
> I agree, I truly believe that many of the YES votes would vote NO if
> they
> had the opportunity. I've been on the board for some very high pressure
> votes, and have made wrong decisions also. Sometimes one argument will
> override
> your common sense and mistakes happen. Sometime you get the opportunity
> to
> correct such votes, sometimes not.
>
> I believe the anger is caused primarily by frustration, and I doubt it is
> personal. Such anger will, I'm sure abate, as soon as the Board
> demonstrates
> willingness to revisit and correct the situation. There is ample
> justification to revisit that vote. I'm sure Lew must be working to find
> the best
> solution.
>
> Regards,
> Dick Whalen
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> In a message dated 2/8/2007 6:20:52 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> zlrockenstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Thanks so much for clarifying this, Dick. I just have to believe that at
> least one YES voter will come forward and rescue our club and our
> reputation.
> I can't believe any of them really wanted Hunte in the club, and I'll bet
> most of them would welcome an opportunity to revisit the vote.
> Meanwhile, I am
> starting to get very concerned about the level of anger (including my own)
> that has been hurled at half of our board. Even though I don't know most
> of
> these people personally, I have known them both by reputation and by
> random
> acts of kindness that have come my way for many years. These are not
> evil
> people! I would vote for most of them again! It was a mistakie. Let's
> undo it
> and move on. This is my last post on the subject. I want to spend my
> time
> congratulating new champions, ROMs, litters, OFAs, etc and talking about
> electric water buckets. That is why I am on this list...not to
> criticize.
>
> Dr. Zoa Rockenstein
> RiverRock
> ________________________________
>
> From: RFWFORGSD@xxxxxxx [mailto:RFWFORGSD@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thu 2/8/2007 4:52 AM
> To: sally@xxxxxxxxxxx; Rockenstein, Zoa L. ; dgshwpromo@xxxxxxxxx;
> f.fasano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: unite
>
>
> There are two reasons a re-vote can be called.
>
> 1. The President declares the vote "Null and Void" because of the
> violations of GSDCA Bylaws, and Roberts Rules of Order.
> a. the Executive Session was not properly constituted with a motion,
> second
> and vote.
> b. the vote was not taken in accordance with the Bylaws.
> 2. At least one of the Yes voters may request a vote to reconsider. (in
> writing)
> a. The President can then call a meeting and discussion and
> reconsideration
> vote using electronic means, either email or conference call.
> 3. Such action will get this disaster behind us, so the real work of
> the
> club can proceed.
>
> Of course, a revote is futile unless the President is reasonably assured
> that the No's would prevail.
>
> Dick Whalen
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> In a message dated 2/7/2007 5:20:32 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> sally@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>
> Zoa
> A revote may not be a good way to go. It is possible the BOD has dug
> their
> feet in on the way they voted and no one is willing to change-I don't
> think a
> revote could be accomplished till the next board meeting and I for one
> would
> like to see this settled by then-
>
> Sally
> www.embroiderybysally.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ============================================================================
> POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the
> original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or
> FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the
> original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
>
> ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
> MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
> PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
> FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL
> BE PROSECUTED.
>
> For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
> ============================================================================
>
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================
Other related posts:
