Sorry, that should read "you are the same person AFTER you pin the judge's badge on that you were before." P Peggy wrote: >Someone just said 4 -- but you are right, it keeps changing. There were >no numerical requirements when I applied, and when the AKC came out with >the 10-4-2 rule, there was a great hue and cry from the old timers... >now we have people breeding more than they would have without those >numbers being published, just so they can become judges. For some >reason there are people who think being a judge makes them more >important and smarter, when in actuality, you are the same person before >you pin the judge's badge on that you were before. > > > ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================