[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: explanations
- From: "Rbuffdogs ." <rbuffdogs@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Doc Zoe <wynsum@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 17:28:31 -0700
THANK YOU ZOE!!!!!!!!
Kathy
*http://www.victorygermanshepherds.com*
*Updated: June 2013*
*CH. Elvaston's Nations Cup TC, 26 BOBs
CH. Victory's Leviathan
**Kappo von Eisenwerk*
*RBIF Monarch's Tarragon v Kaleef*
*
*
*"Victory...*Vires et honestas"
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Doc Zoe <wynsum@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2013, at 16:15, Carolyn Martello wrote:
>
>
> 1. this DQ change did not generate from the membership.
>
> REPLY--> A change of the standard DOES not have to be generated by the
> membership.
> However it was generated, the Board which was elected to care for the
> needs of the club
> obviously felt it was worth looking into.
>
> 2. Many of us believe it should never have put to a vote by the Board
>
> REPLY--> everyone is entitled to an opinion. All opinions should be
> acknowledged. While many
> feel the subject should never have come up, others feel that it should.
> Once again, according to
> the BY Laws
> Article IV Section 1 - The General management of the CLub is entrusted to
> the Board.
> The membership will vote on all standard revisions and By law changes. It
> is required. It is not
> necessary to put anything else before the membership
>
>
> 3.even Petitions to allow the white dogs to separate....and NEVER acted
> upon.
>
> REPLY--> Once again, only the smallest of three white groups made a
> request. The other two
> groups said that they did not was to separate. The petition contained over
> 300 signatures.
> The Board did act upon the request - it has been discussed several times
> at several meetings
> This group requested a letter to the AKC that we would not stop this group
> leaving the breed.
> We did not write a letter to the AKC on advice of Council and the AKC Rep.
> All this is in the
> minutes.
> It is not necessary for the Board to go to the membership over every
> decision they make.
>
> 4. Lowering the fee for Dues during the very time this goes to AKC
> is a bit bothersome when the lowering of the membership fees is
> ADVERTISED ON THE WHITE GSD SITE AS A MOTIVE TO JOIN THE GSDCA SO
> THEY CAN THEN VOTE FOR REMOVAL OF THE DQ in the Standard....
>
> REPLY--> The special rate was voted in in 2012 for one year to increase
> membership, and
> renewed for another year.
>
> IT WAS NOT DONE TO, as the email implies, to garner more white owners to
> sway a vote. The
> special rate was already in effect.If people are advertising this, it is
> out of the control of the
> GSDCA, its Board and membership. And the vote will not come up until 2014,
> so those people
> will have to renew at the FULL rate.
>
>
>
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
