In a message dated 11/16/2004 7:02:04 PM Central Standard Time, RihadinK9@xxxxxxx writes: What part of the Standard calls for "exciting"? I agree with Sally that there is a serious problem in the breed with fronts, but "exciting" isn't necessarily correct either. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Don't go putting words in my mouth Virginia. I never said anything about exciting being in correct. After being around for a while I am not willing to accept just ok . I want excitement in a dog. I want to get goose bumps when they move- big long strides with a extreme opening front and a rear to match. a dog with bone , substance head etc. I want a show dog attitude. I want one who walks into the ring and says here I am look at me. the difference between an ok dog and a great dog is that the great dog has the attributes to make him exciting Sally The House of Nasdaq ROM Ch's Seiko, Adam & Ex http://danann.netfirms.com http://www.freewebs.com/embroiderybysally ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2004. All material remains the property of the Poster and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original poster AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For technical help and administrative matters, please contact the List Administrators at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================