In a message dated 7/8/2005 12:33:26 AM Central Daylight Time, kmc@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes: To think that AKC would take it upon themselves to determine that a properly registered BBS imported into this country should be enrolled into the gene pool of a breed with an entirely different name, I find extremely disturbing. I would think you guys would as well. ------------------------------------- You know I would be extremely disturbed if the BBS wasn't 100% GSD and the AKC allowed them to be registered as GSDs. Perhaps the AKC should be questioned on this, but I suspect they've done their research and found that the dogs actually are 100% GSD. If you have information that the BBS is not 100% GSD, let me know I'd be glad to question their decision. Tom Langlitz ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================