In a message dated 5/9/2008 9:50:02 PM Mountain Daylight Time, cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > I certainly didn't object to changing the Breeders Code... what I objected > to (and still do) is making signing it a condition of membership. Wow....where did that come from, Ginger?! It never was even mentioned as a condition of membership....never was, never will be. The Breeders Code is a voluntary issue...NOTHING to do with membership. Maybe you're confusing the BC with the general ethics statement that would accompany a membership application. I believe the Ethics Committee is still working on that wording. Jamie ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org ============================================================================