[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Whites
- From: Jen Proud <proudk9@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peggy <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:25:47 -0500
Well gee- I was just trying to separate genetic fact from fallacy. Sorry for
your thinking its fluff. I won't bother anymore then. It's not worth being
attacked for sharing the facts because they don't agree with someone's
agenda/opinion.
I just honestly believed that people would want to base their opinions and
ideas on now proven facts rather than 50 year old theories which were based on
a wrong idea due to the limited knowledge of genetics of the day. I know
many breeders & exhibitors don't have time nor interest for reading scientific
research articles & papers and the like. Not everyone can memorize hundreds of
pedigrees/litters for genetic charting. Of those who can and have time for
both don't always care to share their hard-earned knowledge with others. Maybe
I was just taught that information sharing would benefit the breed as well as
the breeders who use the collective information because everyone would be
producing healthier & better looking dogs overall-- all for using that shared
knowledge.
Not that I'm for the change of standard as it is worded either regardless of if
I like whites or not; we'd just be back at it in 5 years to correct all the
ambiguities (like seasonal shedding and so -is a not black nose a serious fault
or a DQ(???) does woolly mean too long an undercoat or what- for starters!) it
would just be a waste of time money & effort to do over so soon as the AKC
allowed.
Not like any bylaw or standard change will ever happen with "voter turnout" so
low... I don't know why anyone thinks anything will happen from all this or
anything else as it obviously isn't worth even voting to most (over 60%!!) of
the membership as it already is before all this mess.
Have a nice evening-
Jen P & the Pack still naïve as hell actually thinking people would rather
have the truth be told but it's okay like that. I never feel silly romping with
my dogs then
JayDee's Proud-Haus Shepherds/Proud K911
www.jaydeesphs.com
Committed to the Total Dog you can be Proud of!!!
AKC Breeder of Merit
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 13:32, "Peggy" <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Guess what? None of this discussion about what kind of white it is
> matters...it is not allowed. The founder of the breed did not specify
> whether he didn't want white because it was caused by a masking gene, he just
> said he didn't want white.
> I swear, there are people who will argue about anything, just to see their
> words in print...even when the topic they're going on about is not pertinent
> to the discussion.
>
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
