[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: What this "white" person brings to the table
- From: Bokenkampgsd1@xxxxxxx
- To: amidon481@xxxxxxx, marcatoshepherds@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:01:03 -0500 (EST)
The AKC won't acknowledge them as a variety, they pretty much have made
that clear.
To be a separate color, there would have to be a class for such.
Also, nothing puts pigment back in a black and tan like breeding to a good
sable...black and tan to black and tan after many generations also washes
out colors. Different than pigment....
Molly
In a message dated 2/7/2013 11:28:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
amidon481@xxxxxxx writes:
Whites would have been fine if white bred to white..BUT breeding to a
white took away rich pigment when bred to a black and tan..Thats were we got
washed out pigment black and cremes no saddles etc...We should leave whites a
separate color but not DQ.Barbara Amidon
============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2012. All material remains the property of the original
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post. This group and its
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in
any post.
ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org
SUBSCRIPTION:http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
Other related posts:
