[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: Was Standard Proposal-Why it will pass when the standar...

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "LeBrowngsd@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: hickoryhillgsd1@xxxxxxxxxxxx, inflight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:10:02 -0400 (EDT)

CG you will die waiting for that answer. That money is  long gone but  
WHERE?
 
Lee Brown
Too far from the womb and too close to the tomb to  care about what anyone 
thinks of me.
 
In a message dated 8/26/2014 7:49:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
hickoryhillgsd1@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Perhaps  the  next question should be "Where is the allocated money from 
Purina  for the Illustrated Standard????"  CG
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 8/25/14, patty  Szymczak <pagairs@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Subject: Re: [ SHOWGSD-L ] Was  Standard Proposal-Why it will pass when the 
standard doesn't need  changing.
To: "inflight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"  <inflight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "<hickoryhillgsd1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>"  <hickoryhillgsd1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"<showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>"  <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, August 25, 2014, 10:09  PM

Kathaleen, who took the Illustrated
Standard after  you?

Sent from my iPad

On May 21, 2014, at 10:37 AM, "Kathaleen  Strong" <inflight@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Well... As much  as I normally like to stay the hell out
of all of this list
>  business, I read the title, did a little more research,
read a few  posts...
> made some coffee.. and now I'm going to make my first
post  to this list in
> quite a long time.  I'm fairly sure after  I've
posted, several of you will
> be displeased.. My apologies in  advance.
> 
> 
> I quoted Christine's post specifically  because, I think
that for the first
> time in since I gave up my Long  Term membership, this
isn't the answer.  I
> had been a member  of the GSDCA for 24-25 years (less
the 3 months that my
> membership  check was sent back to me because I was late
--- same as almost
> 900  people were...)
> 
> 
> 
> I just deleted two  paragraph that even I couldn't put
out there into the
> internet  world -- suffice it to say, the Egomaniac(s)
involved in this, have
>  been in charge of WRECKING this breed for longer than I
was a member,  some
> of them longer than I've been alive, but I believe they
have a  particularly
> incessant need to see just how far they can go  before
someone says "stop" --
> typical bully behavior really.   I mean they've
saddled us with a foundation
> of quicksand for  breeding animals.  I'm glad I'm
not breeding and competing
>  anymore -- I just couldn't take being so angry all the
time watching  what
> used to be shows full (and I do mean full -- 100
animals was a  small show)
> of magnificent athletes that used to leave  me
mesmerized as I watched them
> powerfully float around the ring,  turn into
short-necked, plough-horses that
> need a lead to  function.
> 
> 
> 
> Worse, I have such retinal damage  from looking at
movement pictures on
> facebook that people post and  the rest of you all just
"wanna be friends"
> and well I just have  come to the conclusion... If
"Knowledgeable" people,
> who have been  members of this club for as long as they
have been are willing
> to  post movement pictures of clearly outrageously
faulty dogs... I mean  In
> just the last few days I had to vomit at one of them...
If this  is what
> people think are "good movers" and are putting up
pictures  like this -- then
> I'm sorry, there aren't enough members in this  club
worthy of making
> decisions with regards to the standard.   The
Standard for the German
> Shepherd Dog that we currently have has  no need of
change -- what needs to
> change are the idiots in the  middle of the ring growing
a set of eyeballs
> and some intestinal  fortitude, and start JUDGING DOGS
to the Standard and
> stop giving  awards to animals which are not worthy.
> 
> 
> 
> You  know what gets me -- The Illustrated Standard was a
project that my  team
> was going to get done - and it would have been amazing
-- But  certain
> members of the Board of Directors got their ego's in
the  mix and because I
> chose independent people (all of whom had been  as
successful or more
> successful than most on the Board), and the  board
members who had their
> noses out of joint pretty much made it  DETESTABLE to
continue.  I was 43 at
> the time, and those  OLDTIMERS... some of whom may or
may not still be on the
> board, I  don't know ... treated me like I was a kid.. I
had Board members
>  calling me on the phone and SCREAMING in my ear because
I dared to  write
> what happened in the minutes.  Oh and.. being
recording  secretary wasn't
> even what I was voted in to do -- I had Board  members
QUESTION why I was
> creating minutes which contained DETAILS  -- well
because as an executive
> secretary as well as a member for a  long time -- not to
mention what I
> promised the membership when I  was voted in -- they
could be assured that
> they would know what was  going on.. HONESTLY?? 
And of course there will be
> people  trying to be snide and say "well you were always
late with them"   Do
> you have any idea how revolting it is to have to listen
to the  hours of that
> tape and listen to 17 people discuss doing things  and
quibble on ad nauseum,
> and then be questioned and screamed  at?  
> 
> 
> 
> But the ultimate slap in the  face was having to defend
my choices for the
> Illustrated Standard  Committee -- "Why don't you have
more prestigious
> people on your  committee?"  Seriously?  I
specifically chose people who  were
> independent of the machine.  I specifically chose
people  who weren't blinded
> by their own animals -- I also chose people who  had
been successful in
> different venues, both performance and  conformation
showing, breeding their
> own winners (not directed by a  handler)... and when I
asked for artists --
> and we had some folks  submit their work -- they were
drawings of their own
> animals.   Seriously?  The stupid thing is..
the drawing that we did  submit
> to the Board, it was a first sketch... and it was  poo
poo'd... the odd thing
> that still makes me laugh in disgust --  it was based
upon the biggest
> detractor's own dog.  So,  instead we got the
education Chair's pamphlet on
> the "standard" of  an animal that most self respecting
breeders of
> conformation  animals, would place in a pet home with an
apology for the lack
> of  quality.  The only thing that I was able to
actually get accomplished  was
> to insure we had a professional looking website, and
the  Internet Advisory
> Committee was left alone to do its work..which we  did
well, but my
> contribution to it will likely never  be
remembered.  LOL such is life.
> 
> 
> 
>  Making unsound decisions was even worse -- An example
-- There were a  few
> problems with getting ballots to Canada one year. 
Instead  of spending extra
> money to make sure they got there and keeping a  $12,000
bid (might have
> moved it up to $13,000 with extra costs to  Canada), the
pundits of knowledge
> decided "we should go back to  what we know.. Honest
Ballot always did the
> job" -- yeah.. $19K  worth oh.. I still question how
"honest" they are/were..
> some  pretty stupid balloting incongruities took place
while they were  doing
> things.  And on top of it, my Mother's health was
not  good, my business was
> going crazy, and OH RIGHT.. I don't like working  with
people who disrespect
> me and the jockeying for individual  power was just

gross to watch.  I
> resigned.  
>  
> 
> 
> But possibly the worst part -- was watching some  of
those same Board members
> at work at the Columbus National --  that is when the
wind started really
> leaving my sails -- watching  those people persecute one
of their own members
> -- A violation of  the rules instigated a response which
also violated the
> rules --  less of a violation than the first violation
-- The instigator was
>  not brought up on charges, but the responder was -- it
ruined the rest  of
> the show.  But it wasn't over then.. it went on
for  months.. and instead of
> letting it drop -- they continued on trying  to
essentially RUIN these
> people's enjoyment of successfully  competing with the
constant threat of
> losing the privilege.   That kind of crap is what
the power mongers who lead
> this  organization do.  And to add slap in the face
to another slap --  the
> first violator was then crowned with the ultimate
breeder award  that the
> club gives out.  The injustice and inequity of
things  for myself was one
> thing, but watching Board Members do the same  to
others.. I just stopped
> sending my money in... Me, a longtime  member who at one
time, was so broke,
> that the membership and  Review were the most important
thing, that I would
> push off other  bills to make sure it was paid -- that
wasn't the issue when
> I  stopped sending my money in.. I just can't support an
organization  that
> continues to mistreat their successful members,
ignoring their  success at
> the least, persecuting them at the worst, while  they
pander to others.  
> 
> 
> 
> At this  point, not being a member means we don't get to
vote -- Frankly,
>  with the influx of members (given a discount) from the
white faction,  and
> the loss of how many members now, plus the WDA
splinter.. I  doubt it will
> matter... How many members does this club have  now
anyway?  When it's all
> said and done?  Excellent work  GSDCA Board past
and present -- you've done
> your job well.   
> 
> 
> 
> As far as removing long coat as a  fault?  Are you
serious?  Oh this is so
> they can  legitimize the reason for having a long coat
class -- afterall, who
>  in their right mind has a class based upon a fault --
Be aware, the  next
> thing will be Best of Variety (like the collies  and
cockers).  Good grief.
> 
> 
> 
> Color  change?  Well if your membership wants it,
it will happen.. and  when
> you load the membership with folks from that group that
want  whites.. it
> will happen.
> 
> 
> 
> So now  there will be best of variety, coats and color..
wooba!
> 
>  
> 
> Head Change -- dealing with the nose?  The
standard  already speaks to this,
> there should be no need to change it.  A  dog with
a nose not predominantly
> black is to be  disqualified.  Period, end of
story.  Oh wait?  Maybe  they're
> trying to get rid of disqualifications so that
"everyone  can play".
> 
> 
> 
> The bit about dogs biting a  judge being disqualified
being removed at the
> request of the  AKC?  Seriously???  What kind
of people are running that
>  ship??
> 
> 
> 
> The world is upside down.   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
>
============================================================================
>  POST is Copyrighted 2014.  All material remains
the property of the  original author and of GSD
Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS  of any kind
are permitted without prior permission of the  original
author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS  RESERVED.

> 
> Each Author is responsible for the content of  his/her
post.  This group and its administrators are  not
responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in  any
post.
> 
> ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE  FORWARDING,
REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL  WHICH
APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL
PARTIES  TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A  VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS
PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED.  
> 
> For assistance, please contact the List Management  at
admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> VISIT OUR WEBSITE -  http://showgsd.org  SUBSCRIPTION: 
http://showgsd.org/mail.html
>  NATIONAL BLOG -  http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
>
============================================================================
============================================================================
POST  is Copyrighted 2014.  All material remains the property of the 
original  author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of 
any kind  are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of 
the  Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

Each Author is responsible  for the content of his/her post.  This group 
and its administrators are  not responsible for the comments or opinions 
expressed in any post.

ALL  PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER  OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF  ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS  A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED.  

For assistance, please contact the List Management at  admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org   SUBSCRIPTION: 
http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG -  http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================
   





============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2014.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

Each Author is responsible for the content of his/her post.  This group and its 
administrators are not responsible for the comments or opinions expressed in 
any post.

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://showgsd.org  SUBSCRIPTION: 
http://showgsd.org/mail.html
NATIONAL BLOG - http://gsdnational.blogspot.com/
============================================================================

Other related posts: