[ SHOWGSD-L ] UPDATES FROM THE ANIMAL COUNCIL

  • From: "Ginger Cleary" <cleary1414@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Showgsd-L@Freelists. Org" <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 07:15:08 -0400

 Ginger Cleary,Rome, GA  ww.rihadin.com
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo
the fatigue of supporting it.  ~Thomas Paine
Member GSDCA
Member Sawnee Mtn Kennel Club
GA Director Responsible Dog Owners of the Eastern States.

  -----Original Message-----


  UPDATES FROM THE ANIMAL COUNCIL

  June 8, 2007
  (Last publication date 6/6/07
  Appropriate forwarding encouraged.)
  Preserving Our Right To Own And Breed Animals Is Your Responsibility

  IN THIS ISSUE:
  * CA AB 1634 (LEVINE/NAVA/PADILLA/SOLARIO) PARTISAN WEDGE STRATEGY
  * "CA HEALTHY PETS ACT" EGREGIOUS WEB SITE ERROR ON CA SALES TAX

  VOTE NOW IN MSNBC POLL at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113211
  Scroll down in the article to find the poll link and vote for "No
  way. This should be a decision left to pet owners." Results have
  been running very close.

  THE ANIMAL COUNCIL'S web site at http://www.theanimalcouncil.com is
  updated frequently supplementing advocacy information through these
  Updates with new and expanded features. 2007 California bill
  information for each bill we track with links to key documents,
  contact information for legislators and more. The other surviving
  bills are progressing to policy committees in their second house.
  See http://www.theanimalcouncil.com/CA2007.html
  *****

  CA AB 1634 (LEVINE, NAVA, SOLARIO; SEN. PADILLA), the "California
  Healthy Pets Act" passed the Assembly Floor with the bare minimum 41
  affirmative votes and 38 noes on Wednesday, June 6 after weeks of
  hectic lobbying efforts ranging from retained professionals to green
  grassroots. In the end, all 32 Republican votes held and 6 Democrats
  crossed over. Democrat Nell Soto was absent and probably would have
  been an extra affirmative vote. The 40 member Senate has a similar
  ratio with only 15 Republicans, 25 Democrats and only 21 affirmative
  votes needed to pass a bill on the Senate Floor. Democrats also have
  majorities in all committees. Very few California legislative
  districts are competitive by party, making the primary process
  critically important as legislators rotate through term limits of 3
  terms in the Assembly and 2 in the Senate. Current Senators all have
  known past voting records and Democrat Senate President Pro Tem Don
  Perata (D-9) of Oakland has been bullying moderates this year.

  AB 1634 would mandate creation of a new, permanent bureaucracy for
  California's 536 local jurisdictions to enact and implement an intact
  permit to keep unaltered dogs and cats over 4 months of age subject
  to eligibility requirements and restrictions, which have been and
  will be further amended in the Senate as promised by author Levine in
  response to Democrats objecting on the Assembly Floor as well as
  other interest groups. So far, there are no provisions for
  assessment of results over time, sunset date or accountability
  standards for local agencies. AB 1634 awaits assignment to a Senate
  policy committee. When a bill is amended in the second house, it
  must return to the house of origin for concurrence in the later
  amendments before being sent to the Governor who must actually veto a
  bill to prevent it from becoming law.

  CALIFORNIA HEALTHY PETS ACT web site at http://www.cahealthypets.com
  now features several text boxes at the top of the home page,
  accessible by clicking past Bob Barker's letter that now opens the
  web site. While we could take issue with each of these topics, our
  readers have specifically asked that we respond to the following
  topic that concludes with a false statement:

  ***""Hobby Breeders" and "Amateur Breeders" are subject to the same
  rules as the larger breeders.

  The titles hobby breeder and amateur breeder have been coined by "low
  volume" breeders in an effort to make themselves seem innocuous, but
  the terms do not reflect any legal standing.

  According to a 2001 analysis by the State Board of Equalization, "any
  breeder making more than two sales of puppies or kittens during any
  12-month period is required to obtain a seller's permit and report
  the tax on those sales".

  In other words, anyone in California who sells two or more animals
  per year is already required by law to obtain a permit and pay taxes
  on the income. The vast majority of current breeders in California do
  not follow this requirement.***

  We agree that the term "hobby" breeder is not a legal term of art in
  California law (it often is elsewhere), and "amateur" and "low
  volume" are meaningless nonsense. But none of these terms apply to
  whom must have a "California Seller's Permit" ? the term of art used
  by the California Board of Equalization for those sellers required to
  collect and remit sales tax. The threshold for sellers who are not
  engaged in business is "occasional sales" covered in Regulation 1595,
  essentially "Generally, a person who makes three or more sales for
  substantial amounts in a period of 12 months is required to hold a
  seller's permit regardless of whether the sales are at retail or are
  for resale." The BOE position is that this does not mean sales of
  individual pet animals sold by those not otherwise engaged in selling
  pets as a business, so that "sales" would generally include all
  members of a litter in the same way that the exemption for 2 garage
  sales covers sale of ALL items at each of two garage sales ? a garage
  sale being an occasional event different from a regular flea market
  vendor. The CAHPA web site conclusion claims that only one pet
  animal could be sold without a Seller's Permit which is totally
  incorrect. Further, sales tax is not a tax on income but a tax on
  the amount of the sale, paid by the buyer and collected and remitted
  by the seller. It is NOT a tax on the seller's income!

  Of course, the "vast majority" of California breeders do not have
  Seller's Permits, because they do not need them and SHOULD NOT have
  them. Seller's Permits are intended for people making sales in the
  course of business, and very few California breeders are actually
  engaged in breeding as a business. Another common allegation is that
  breeders are pocketing "tax free" income from sales, whereas proper
  accounting for all legitimate deductions (either as hobby or Schedule
  C filers) rarely results in significant taxable income.

  This misrepresentation of fact ? whether made by intentional malice
  or reckless failure to check and cite basic facts is inexcusable when
  linked to the elected legislators and primary sponsors of AB 1634.
  Unfortunately, this approach permeates the entire bill and its
  concept of further reducing shelter entry by placing an ongoing
  burden on the relatively small proportion of owners of intact dogs
  and cats.

  For more information about California sales tax, see
  http://www.boe.ca.gov
  Or speak with a representative at 800-400-7115
  *****

  *a service of THE ANIMAL COUNCIL, P.O. BOX 168, MILLBRAE CA 94030
  Contact us at <TheAnimalCouncil@xxxxxxx>
  URL <http://www.theanimalcouncil.com>
  Incorporated 1991, tax exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(4)
  Online news updates published sporadically since 1997.
  Legislative tracking subject to change.
  Find your own CA legislators
  http://192.234.213.69/lmapsearch/framepage.asp

  __._,_.___
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.11/838 - Release Date: 6/7/2007
2:21 PM


============================================================================
POST is Copyrighted 2007.  All material remains the property of the original 
author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind 
are permitted without prior permission of the original author  AND of the 
Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 

ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY 
MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS 
PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY 
FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE 
PROSECUTED. 

For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org
============================================================================

Other related posts: