I agree with you Peggy, but Cyndy has a valid point too. I know from personal experience that we should be careful about what we say. We can say that Hunte is a broker, and that he may breed some dogs. We also know he owns at least one champion GSD, like it or not. We cannot call him names such as abussive, we have no direct proof to point to. Lawsuites are expensive, and it could be that with the money he SEEMS to have, he could drive more than one of us to bankruptcy defending ourselves, and once we are broke, he could well drop the suite, having gotten anyone who says it just wrong, right in a spot where they can no longer afford their dogs, or to breed more, giving him that much more market for what he has for sale. It is worth the effort to be careful, that's all Cyndy means, and she is correct. I will say little more on this subject, I have said little for some time now. It is overwhelming all other talk here, for better or worse. sheila Peggy <pmick12@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I haven't seen any personal attacks, and I'm trying to read all the posts having to do with this topic. Not because they are pleasant, but because I am being asked to explain "our" thinking to other people in the dog world, and primarily, because I'm trying to understand it myself. As for Hunte reading the posts, if people don't want him to know what they think of him, they shouldn't post...and he shouldn't be surprised, anyway. Peggy Cyndy Davis wrote: >Hi, > >I think it's evident to the board and everyone else that people are outraged >over this decision. Point taken. >At this point we need to focus on a constructive solution, not adding fuel >to the fire. > >First, I want to point out that while it is against our list rules, anything >we say can be forwarded to anyone out there, including Mr. Hunte or other >breed clubs, etc. Frankly some of it has been quite inflammatory and >included personal attacks. I fear that these would be used as evidence in a >lawsuit - personal or against the club. While I've been advised such lawsuit >would be frivolous, why fuel the fire? Lawsuits, frivolous or no, are >expensive to defend - trust me, I know! > >Second point - we have alot of non-members on the list, maybe some who are >new in dogs and looking for guidance. Do we really want to chase them away >from the breed and the club? > >I personally have worked too long and too hard to throw the baby out with >the bathwater! > >I'm not saying don't post, just consider your words carefully and please, no >personal attacks. > >Cyndy > --------------------------------- Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2007. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - www.showgsd.org ============================================================================