[ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The WHite issue & 'mud'.
- From: "Carolyn Martello" <marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <wynsum@xxxxxxx>, <Showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:17:17 -0800
Hi Zoe;
What is NOT clear as mud is why the members are not allowed to speak on this
issue with a vote??
We never asked for a vote on the DQ issue but we were put in that position
anyway.
Yet as members and Standard breeders we were never allowed to "finish" this
problem
with a vote on what we think about allowing the breed separation of these
dogs and
their owner/ breeders who DO want that? Though small in numbers they are
trying to
resolve this instead of continuing on promoting a DQ while insisting on
being referred to
as the Breed that does not allow them.
Why would we care how many are members of which group that does not breed
according
to our Standard anyway? Those who DO breed according to the GSD Standard
and are
judged by it in the ring should be allowed to vote on this issue.
The Board is temporary.... ( sort of ) <G> ( sorry Ed ).....let the
MEMBERSHIP DECIDE.
The MEMBERS pay dues and who remain for YEARS should be able to have their
vote.
Carolyn marhaven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.marhaven.com
-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of Doc Zoe Subject: The WHite issue
Here is the Score card
There are 4 white groups - 2 have banded into a Federation with about
330 members and they DO NOT WANT Separation
AWSA wants separation and they have about 135 members
BBS wants to be a recognized breed as it is in 90 countries with the FCI
since 2003
so their imports can be placed into the BBS breed and not the GSD breed.
This is a new Club with about 12 members and 30 imports.
Clear as Mud
4 clubs, 3 different agendas
Other related posts:
- » [ SHOWGSD-L ] Re: The WHite issue & 'mud'. - Carolyn Martello
